Senator Rand Paul Wants to Redefine Amnesty

George Orwell's "1984" was first published in 1949, but its prophecies are still manifesting themselves.  One of the tricks of a dystopian, dictatorial society, as described in "1984," is to change the names of things to make them sound better, or more palatable to the people affected by them.  In his prophetic novel, "1984," Orwell coined the terms "double-speak," and "double-think" to describe how the government dupes people into accepting better-sounding synonyms to overcome the anathematic connotations of words.

George Bush II was the first to tell us that amnesty for illegal aliens is not amnesty.  He tried to redefine it, but could not come up with a suitable synonym.  Neither can Rand Paul, who recently appeared on Megyn Kelly's show on Fox News.  Paul struggled to come up with a synonym other than "immigration reform," or "pathway to citizenship."  (Bush also tried to deceive us into accepting a huge amnesty for illegal aliens during his second term.)

  I suppose Rand Paul remembers that the last general amnesty for illegal aliens in 1987 was called the "Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1987" (or IRCA).   Politicians promised us that the 1987 amnesty law included a requirement that the border would be thenceforward secured and no further amnesties would be needed.  The people bought it. "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me." was a saying that Bush II could never quote correctly, though he tried, but always screwed it up.  It also applies to his and other politicians' attempts to dupe us on amnesties for illegal aliens.  Since 1900 there have been dozens of amnesties for illegal aliens, but most of them have been for smaller groups.  The ones in 1952 and 1987 were general amnesties. Law-breaking seems to have become the preferred method for immigrating to the U.S. ,which tells you that we are not getting the quality of immigrants we would, if we stick to the quotas for all countries. It shows in our declining education standards, especially in literacy.

Rand Paul alluded to the fact that none of the immigration amnesties for illegal aliens actually used the term "amnesty,' and indeed this term does not appear in the immigration law books.  Most often, amnesties for illegal aliens are referred to by the laws that define them.  Title 8 of the United States Code includes all immigration laws, as does the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended.  Sub-parts of 8 USC define amnesties for illegal aliens; for example the last two amnesties, one in the late 1990s and one in the early 2000s were called "241(i)" and "Extension of 245(i)", respectively, as they appear in the I&N Act of 1952, as amended, and as 8 USC 1255 and its subparts.

Drowing in Compassion

When referring to illegal immigration, the word "compassion"  is liberal left-wing, Marxist propaganda.

The most common falsehood spread by the propagandists relates to so-called separation of parents from their children by deportation. IT IS NEVER NECESSARY!

The reason it is never necessary to separate minor children from their parents is because illegal aliens giving birth to children in the U.S. always convey their  nationality and citizenship to their children under international law.  It is called the principle of "jus sanguinis."   It is the same law by which Ted Cruz obtained U.S. citizenship through his mother.

Therefore, parents being deported never have to leave their children behind due to a loophole in U.S. law, the 14th Amendment.

The 14th Amendment was never meant to be a loophole for so-called anchor-babies.  It's purpose was to create U.S. citizenship for the United States residents, end Reconstruction and stop the violence in the Deep South.  After the Civil War, carpetbagger governments, composed mostly of black minorities and former Union Army Officers, in the South were tyrannical, punishing former Confederate soldiers by disenfranchising them from their states' citizenship--the only kind of citizenship around in 1869, until the 14th Amendment created U.S. citizenship.

The Council on Foreign Relations and other globalist organizations would like to see the end of national citizenship, loyalties to countries of birth and international borders. Unfortunately, most U.S. politicians seem beholden to them because of their power and money.  That is the only reason they, and THEIR media (yes, they own and control it like they do much of our economy and politics) are always clamoring for another amnesty for illegal aliebs.  The im;portation of illiterate, third-world peons are the future voters that they hope to give them everything they want in exchange for Government handouts.

Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's minister of propaganda, once said that if you repeat a lie often enough, it will be believed.  Goebbels was more honest than the U.S. media, most politicians  and the left-wing Marxists.  He told the people exactly what he was going to do, then he did it.

Ted Cruz for President

(Reprinted from my comment on the Yahoo News Page)

BTW, to the Yahoo know-nothings in re nationality law: Cruz is a native born (i.e., by birth) citizen of the U.S pursuant to 8 USC 1401(e). Unlike Obama, his mother had the citizenship AND the U.S. residence requirements to convey U.S. citizenship to him at birth.

No other candidate knows and loves our Constitution better than Cruz. Texas entrusted him to represent them as their Solicitor General in no less than 9 Supreme Court cases. Not only does he know the Constitution, he has the oratory skills necessary to defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic (of which there are too many within our borders).

Cruz' early candidacy announcement is more proof of his honesty and willingness to take chances. We already know who the other candidates are; most are alien-amnesty advocate wimps waiting until they think the political wind is blowing favorably. They are of the Weeping John Boehner ilk, of which we have too many. Cruz had his haters in Texas when he ran for the Senate, like those on this Yahoo Page, but he not only overcame those haters, he also overcame the Texas Big Spenders (Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst spent $18 million of his own money and still lost to him). Cruz is Tea Party and that is one of his biggest assets.The GOP cannot beat Hillary without the support of the Tea Party voters and the true conservative Independents.

Jeb Bush is NOT the Man: The Iowa Agriculture Summit Farce Dedicated to Amnesty

The Iowa Agriculture Summit held its first ever meeting in Des Moines, Iowa today, March 7, 2015.

“The industry-sponsored summit — in which each hopeful answered questions on energy, the environment, immigration and food safety in solo sessions with agriculture businessman Bruce Rastetter — highlighted the demands that Iowans place on candidates to pay attention to the state that hosts the first presidential caucuses.” [1]

It should surprise no one that liberal, amnesty advocate, Jeb Bush "won" this "summit."

Like his older brother, George 43, Jeb is mastering the Orwellian tactic of doublespeak (Bush 43 said, "This (amnesty) is not an amnesty,") showing his contempt for the intelligent and informed. Once an illegal alien is given any kind of Government clemency against deportation, he would perforce immediately becomes eligible for all the benefits of a legal alien, including welfare, Medicaid, free education, etc. Jeb Bush knew this, but lied through his teeth at the "Summit" about it.  To give them less than the full benefits of a lawfully admitted alien for permanent residence would be to create a Government-styled caste, or class, system, that would be unconstitutional.[2] It would take only a short time for some U.S. Judge to rip to shreds Jeb Bush's concept of an amnesty not being an amnesty.

No Democrat Congressman or presidential candidate attended the Farce because they believe that the so-called, “Hispanic vote,” is already in their collective hip pocket.  But, is it? Educated, citizen Hispanics know where Liberal Democrats and their GOP amnesty allies are really coming from. 

Democrat politicians had nothing to gain with rhetoric in a state that is dependent upon cheap (illegal) labor.  And Jeb Bush wants to dupe us into believing that he is a “conservative?”

Neither Democrat nor Republican liberals, like Bush, the Gang of 8, Rick Perry, nor other advocates for amnesty, will tell Hispanics the truth. The rich and powerful will not necessarily base their Hispanic employees’ wages upon the content of an Hispanic's education and ability, so much as upon his/her Hispanic surname. Wise Hispanics are indeed coming over to the Tea Party.  It is the only political party for true conservatives, the self-reliant; the only political party for those that want to be independent of Government watch and ward.

Ted Cruz and true conservatives, should not have dignified this farcical meeting their presence. It was rigged by Bruce Rastetter, and it was all about amnesty.  Cruz doesn't have a prayer in that ring.  True conservatives, like Cruz, will have to write off plantation states with temporary (harvest season) sanctuary for illegal aliens--states, like Iowa and Mississippi--in the primaries--if they want the GOP nomination for president in 2016.  They need to concentrate their time and resources in states they can win--states that are fed up with the foreign invasion, runs on our welfare system by illegal aliens and some Congressmen that uphold only their contempt for the Constitution.

Iowa holds these meetings early on purpose--to try to give their amnesty candidates a leg up on the competition, before the real race for the nomination starts in the middle of an election year.  Pseudo-conservative, amnesty-advocates, such as liberal Mike Huckabee, scored big in the early Iowa Caucus in 2012. It makes good headlines for a Media that wants to see the GOP lose again, but serves nobody in the GOP any useful purpose. The media wants to demoralize true conservatives and discourage them from even voting in the GOP presidential elections. Toss it out as an unreliable "poll" without any meaningful significance.  It is an enemy Trojan Horse that serves the liberal Media's purpose by keeping unelectable liberals like Huckabee, Scott Walker, Jeb Bush, Rick Perry and other liberal GOP losers in the cluttered-field spotlight, giving the viable GOP candidates less free news and camera time.

Liberals and the super-rich's emissaries from both sides of the aisle, want amnesty for illegal aliens. Both want us to believe that the majority of the legal Hispanic voters in the U.S. want unlimited immigration.  Liberals from neither party will admit that Hispanics will suffer from another general amnesty due to depressed wages. Big Industry wants a labor pool similar to Red China’s, one that is functionally illiterate, and one that will help them at the ballot box to weaken, or eliminate, the EPA, the Department of Labor's  Wage and Hour Department (which under Solis, does little enforcement anyway); they want laws profiting them to bring back their factories from graft-ridden China and other third world countries; the huddled masses of the third world to our south can give them that..

Neither Iowa political power broker, Bruce Rastetter, nor his harvester friends, care squat about what happens to their migratory, cheap, agriculture labor after the crop harvest.  He and Iowa growers know that, after the harvest, their cheap laborers go "home" and help drain Texas' welfare system.  They remain in Texas until their next gig of cheap labor, if they have any kind of document to buy some temporary safe harbor from deportation--such as Rick Perry's Dream Act, a de facto amnesty for illegal alien students and their "unified" extended families.  No illegal alien plans to work any longer than it takes him/her to get on welfare permanently where he/she can earn more for doing nothing.  Utopia accomplished. The cycle begins again when the Iowa farmers start clamoring for more laxity on the border so they can get their crops harvested.

If not eligible for the Dream Act or other act of clemency, illegal farm workers may go back to Mexico for Christmas, knowing that as long as Obama is President, the border will always be open for their return.  Actually the border has always been easily breached, considering the revolving door policy that has always given illegal aliens as many chances as they need, with impunity for failed efforts, to get past the Border Patrol. The temporarily departed will be back in Texas by March or early April, in time to file Form 1040’s for their earned income tax credits, often six or seven thousand dollars on all wages earned, legally or illegally in the U.S. the previous year. Illegal aliens do not even need a social security number to file a 1040.  All they need is an ITIN (individual tax identification number) provided for free by the IRS.  Vista Volunteers assist illegal aliens to file 1040 returns (electronically).   Barack Obama has warned Customs and Immigration border guards against impeding his constituents’ profitable pursuits, lest there “be consequences.” [3]  B

Can illegal aliens re-enter the U.S. to claim EIC tax money he/she thinks the IRS owes him?  Yes.  Any illegal alien may be granted a waiver of a passport or visa for emergency or humanitarian reasons under 1182 USC(d)(4)A), such as coming to claim money "owed" to him by the IRS as EIC. The waiver may be granted by any immigration officer at the POE on behalf of the Attorney General, at the officer's discretion, if he thinks the application meets the criteria under 8 USC 1182(d)(4)(A). There is a (somewhat) safeguard that border inspectors may employ to keep such an illegal from staying in the U.S.: the surety bond.[4] Although this bond is used extensively at international airport POEs, it has seldom been used at land border ports.  This is another area where the INS had been remiss in its duties, as well as not using AFIS at the POE.  Both areas would be too effective and therefore inconsistent with the institutionalized status quo of laxity in immigration law enforcement.   

Obama notwithstanding, any present or past border guard will tell you that, beginning in late March, or early April, each year since 1975, Border Patrol apprehensions of illegal aliens and their smugglers always drop off drastically because pursuing EIC is no longer an urgent goal for illegal aliens.

An FYI to those hard working, tax-burdened citizens just beginning to become outraged by EIC for illegal aliens:  Illegal aliens have been getting earned income tax credits (EIC) for 40 years. It was sloughed off on taxpayers during the lame-duck era of the Gerald Ford Administration.  Nothing in any of the EIC laws, or its revisions, have ever proscribed illegal aliens  from getting EIC. Some illegal aliens can almost double their annual income, with the EIC portion--free money and tax-free income.  Most illegal aliens do not earn enough income to be required to file a 1040 IRS return, but they file one anyway (with help from Vista Volunteers), only to get the EIC--expedited with free, electronic filing.

 “Enacted in 1975, the initially modest EIC has been expanded by tax legislation on a number of occasions, including the widely-publicized Tax Reform Act of 1986, and was further expanded in 1990, 1993, and 2001, regardless of whether the act in general raised taxes (1990, 1993), lowered taxes (2001), or eliminated other deductions and credits (1986).[9] Today, the EITC is one of the largest anti-poverty tools in the United States. (Most income measures, including the poverty rate, do not account for the credit.)”[5]

DHS Should Not Be Funded Anymore

"The world is far too dangerous for House Republicans to show so little regard for the security of American families." (Quite on the Yahoo web page.)

Really? It is time to choose your poison.

Which is more dangerous, terrorists? or a Manchurian Candidate that knows how to get what he wants by tying its funding to (seemingly) essential service programs?

The DHS does not protect our borders. Instead, it uses our Border Patrol and their resources to illegally] transport Obama's imported foreign constituents to safe houses deep in the interior of the U.S., a felony cognizant under 8 USC 1324(a)(i). Should taxpayers be funding activities detrimental to the survival of our Republic? Some Border Patrolmen who have recently deported illegal aliens are being threatened with criminal action by Obama, and he has sent for the aliens to come back, to be given safe passage through immigration and customs.

Do we really need the DHS? Terrorists are cowards and know that we are, in spite of Obama's disarmament efforts, an individually armed nation, and we can do without a DHS that is led by a so-called "leader" totally alien to American principles.The DHS should not only be eliminated as a Government Agency, but should be renamed the Department of Homeland Insurrection and banished to some place like Gitmo so we can supervise and observe their activities at all times.

It is time for a showdown, not capitulation and surrender to a dictator. Next year, in November, we true conservatives will remember Congressmen who sold out and surrendered their exclusive Congressional authority to legislate immigration laws, as opposed to those who stood up to domestic tyranny.

Ted Cruz Does Well in the CPAC Straw Poll

Senator Ted Cruz came in third in the CPAC straw poll--not with any help from pseudo-conservative Fox News—nor from  its liberal allies, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN and Aljazeera, but IN SPITE OF them.  That is a very good sign for this early in the season.  Cruz faced a similar obstacle when running for Senator against the old guard Republican establishment in Texas and won--in spite of the millionaires’ and the media's support for the opposition in favor of maintaining the status quo.  The liberal media wants to select the GOP (loser) presidential candidate in 2016 the way the NY Times did in 2012, and later dismantle him, the way they did Romney, with unprecedented vituperative. 

Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Rick Perry, Mike Huckabee, Jeb Bush, Lindsey Graham, Jeff Flake and most of the GOP 2016 hopefuls have at one time advocated amnesty; and those who were members of the “Gang of 8” worked fervently with the most liberal Democrats for an amnesty  for illegal aliens.  See:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/gang-introduce-immigration-bill-today/story?id=18964718

The ambitious presidential candidates mentioned in the above paragraph are liberals masquerading as conservatives. All the most publicized candidates, except Cruz, are in the hip pockets of the global elitists that want to flood this country with cheap labor and establish a labor pool and obedient socialist electorate--similar to China's.

Ted Cruz is the by far best speaker and orator of the potential GOP candidates for president, and he is a Constitutional expert that has always adhered to its principles.  As Texas Solicitor General, he argued nine cases for Texas before the Supreme Court of the United States.  The Republican establishment is presently letting Obama intimidate them, by holding the purse strings of the economy hostage, threatening to veto a bill to operate the DHS, unless it includes funding for his declared amnesty for illegal aliens. Only the Tea Party members of Congress are not quaking in their boots (like John Boehner).

 Only the Tea Party in the U.S. Congress leads the fight for rule of law, the Constitution, our sovereignty, the integrity of our border and maintaining our way of life.  Only the newly elected Tea Party members in Congress dare charge Obama with the legally correct impeachable offense of usurpation of the powers of Congress and the separation of powers of the three branches of Government. In a debate with Hillary, Ted Cruz will have a long-term memory of her malfeasance from Arkansas to First Lady to (incompetent) Secretary of State.  Ted Cruz will rip her to shreds in a debate, without stuttering or needing an Obama-type Teleprompter.

That is exactly why the liberal media, including Fox News, are deathly afraid of Ted Cruz,  and they will pull out all the stops to try to discredit him, including making up false stories and having their minions cross party lines to vote for his opponents in GOP primaries. The old guard GOP defeated the Tea Party candidate that way in the Mississippi in 2014, sending stagnated, dull, status-quo Thad Cochran back to the Senate to help try to stop the Tea party.  Fasten your seat belts, folks.  Ted Cruz  survived a tougher battle in the Texas Senate race, and if he wins, true change is coming.

Marco Rubio’s Abject Ignorance on Immigration

On Saturday, February 28, 2015, in an interview with Sean Hannity of Fox News, Marco Rubio stated that presently “all immigration (to the U.S.) is based on family relationships.” 

(Note that nearly all of the 2016 GOP candidates that Fox News is puffing are globalists that want more amnesties for illegal aliens.  No doubt, Hannity is doing it at the behest of his boss, Rupert Murdoch, an avowed globalist, anarchist and senior fellow in the CATO institute.)

In response to Hannity’s rigged questions, Marco Rubio seemed to be proposing changes in the immigration law to admit more skilled workers and members of the professions. Duh!

Marco Rubio, did you know that there is a great abundance of unused and un-applied-for U.S. immigrant visas available for skilled workers and members of the professions—such as scientists, engineers, researchers, world-renown inventors, etc.?

Do a little research, Marco Rubio.  Go to the State Department’s web site at   

http://travel.state.gov/content/visas/english/law-and-policy/bulletin/2015/visa-bulletin-for-march-2015.html

There, you will see two State Department Immigrant visa availability charts; the first one is for family-sponsored preference immigrant visas; and the second one for employment-based preference quota visas. You will note that the family-sponsored applicants far outnumber the visas available.  Those dates in the squares of the chart indicate the date of application of those immigrants that are now receiving their immigrant visas.  A superfluous number of applicants have backlogged every category, some as far back as ten years or longer. Demographers that establish the immigration quotas know how many legal immigrants we can absorb each year without losing our language, identity, culture and values. Illegal immigration, however, renders their work moot.

Now, look at the employment-based chart, just a few lines below the first chart.  Almost all categories of skilled workers are “current.”  That means that there are thousands of unused visas available for workers that we really need in this country, but are not applying. Can you blame them?  Just read what stories of racial strife and violence that has occupied the U.S. media headlines for the past ten years, and especially since the agitator Barack Obama became President.  Then go figure why any highly intelligent, renowned, self-reliant person would want to come to this country.

Marco Rubio, we do not need any kind of immigration reform.  We just need to start enforcing the immigration laws on the books, and to stop rewarding illegal immigrants with amnesty and residency, instead of deporting them.

We need a GOP presidential candidate in 2016 that can do research before making absurd remarks about our “failed immigration policies.”  They fail because politicians like Marco Rubio are ignorant and want to capitulate to illegal immigration, rather than obey the Constitution and enforce the laws.

In 2016, American patriots and conservatives need to reject those GOP candidates that have betrayed the sanctity of our national sovereignty and the integrity of our borders.  They include all of the four members of the “Gang of 8” amnesty advocates (of which Marco Rubio is a member).  They include all of those politicians willing to capitulate to the foreign invasion instead of meet it with the force needed to comply with Article IV, part 4 of the Constitution.  It requires the President and Congress to protect every state against foreign invasion.  

Those politicians who do not uphold the Constitution committed perjury when they swore to do so upon taking office. We know who is behind this and to whom Marco Rubio: Fox News, and all the other globalists, and their media, to whom they are beholden.  Their puppeteers are the super- rich industrialists that want to build up a base of laborers in this country similar to China’s so that they can bring back their factories to this country and pay wages similar to what they pay in China. They want to import voters that think socialism is Utopia and that wealth can be re-distributed.