The Firing of Megyn Kelly From Fox News

As a lawyer, Megyn Kelly should know the difference between a question and a statement.  Her statement to Trump at the first debate was a lengthy, poorly disguised, barrage of embarrassing questions with predicated conclusions that highlighted her hostile opinion, but not necessarily facts.  She wanted to turn the debate into the Megyn Kelly coming-out show.  She gambled her career on her effort to destroy Trump.  She had hoped to win the gamble and send her esteem among women activists soaring and become the hero of an over-estimated "feminine movement".  She must have felt that as a member of the media, she could rely on all the other networks to join her smear of Trump.  They did, but the days of the corrupt mainstream media bamboozling the majority is at an end. 

The more the mainstream media tries to destroy someone, like Trump, the stronger they make him. If women, or other minorities, want to get involved in politics, from now on they must be able to stand the heat. With the departure of Obama, we slough off the paranoia of criticizing any minority politician, without a hint of a racial slur, yet still being called a racist.  Color became the King's X of immunity from criticism, even if the criticism is dead on and right.  The only good I can see coming out of the Obama years is the awakening of the American male and restoring his manhood.  It will no longer be noble to bow down before those inferior in intellect and ability.  We have confused noblesse oblige with cowardice and the latter has made us take a back seat to the mentally challenged politicians running for office.  We have learned how needlessly skittish we had become of making any kind of critical remark against any kind of minority.

Our career politicians paid the price of their spinelessness by acquiescing to the election of a president totally at odds with American culture and American values.  Good riddance to him and our paranoia. The Tea party is here to stay and we will, we must, make it stronger.  Anyone is welcome as long as they are conservative, honest and have a firm grip on reality. There is no room for career demagogues, the lazy and the phonies whose only skill is a loud mouth and the ability to rouse the rabble with false claims of oppression. .

Kumbaya and Liberal Mental Illness

Just how sick a lot of liberals have become is a sobering experience which has come to the fore more blatantly after the Trump election. They have been oriented the past eight years in liberal thought and all the litanies that fly in the face of logic and common sense. There are pervasive mass neuroses afoot. Some reveal much deeper psychological problems, such as sociopath personality. These are the most dangerous kind, because like Judas goats, they can lead the weaker minds to their destruction.

After every Marxist conquest, there follows an intensive government re-education program that orients former opponents to accept their doctrine and to accept the conquest.  There, the potential troublemakers are weeded out and confined in political prisons where most will never be seen again. The free world and true democracy does not do that, which means that the sick minds will go on, , preferably in a dormant condition that decays into oblivion, now that their leader of the past eight. years  is going to be out of power. College students are captive audiences of wacky college professors, some of them extremists; Bill Ayers is a good example.  These students are especially vulnerable because warped-brain college professors make them mental automatons. They manipulate these students into doing their bidding while they, like puppeteers, keep a safe distance.  Most of those students will never be able to tap into the superego, that part of the brain that Nietzsche was talking about when he talked about the Overman; man or woman that overcome themselves --mankind's greatest obstacle--and becomes a superman. That lofty goal is even more difficult when present social engineering is designed to keep them moving along with the herd.

The rest of us do not have to tolerate these people when they get too far out of line.  We have a duty to do our part in seeing to it that the U.S. recovers from its brief excursion into Obama-thought;  i.e., Marxism.  Before they are finished, it might take a scene like Kent State, or Watts, to sober them up. The state governors should refuse to send the National Guard anywhere they do not have the authority of martial law, and martial law quickly sobers up the unruly.  The National Guardsmen and women were never meant to be scarecrows, or fodder for brickbats and other thrown objects.  Too far out of line means outside the confines of the law, and they should be dealt  with accordingly. Good citizens need to cooperate with law enforcement to get the misguided back on the right track--by force when they become threats to the peace and tranquility of the community.  Many of these people already have criminal records because they are not the types that easily conform to the rules  of society.  The contrast between them and your ordinary criminal is merely a matter of semantics. The narcissism and egos of sociopaths demand popular attention, but the worst error of society would be to pander to, or even humor, them.  They need to take the hard knocks that they earn and own the consequences of their conduct and obstinacy. We do not expect them to learn or change; but we have a duty to marginalize them and keep them from disrupting our right to peace and tranquility.

Deportation Proceedings Made Easy

I think that the Trump Administration will be fair and warn those here illegally that they will jeopardize their chances of immigrating legally to the U.S. if they wait to be formally deported, rather than return to their home countries voluntarily, to apply for a legal visa.  Activists and some shyster lawyers might jeopardize an alien's chances of immigrating legally, if they advise him/her to wait and be formally deported.   The DHS, under Trump, will probably have printed up some handbills and publish warnings and information in Spanish and English on the Internet, on TV  and in newspapers. The information addressed to illegal aliens, should warn them that if they wait for deportation, they must, after formal deporation, wait a minimum of five years  just to apply for a visa. There is no guarantee that they will then get one in five years, because Trump has proposed lowering immigration quotas, something that is long overdue.

Aliens under formal deportation proceedings do not have a right to release on bond and  Appearance Bonds  are  rarely granted.  The aliens can be detained for as long as it takes for them to appear before an immigration judge.  This cannot be emphasized too much: Illegal alien parents that think that theirchidren born here (anchor babies) will give them immunity against deportation are wrong.  (See Matter of Melendez, Interim Dec. #2539, dated 10/20/1976 and others referenced in this decision)

Before Obama  tried to make a new immigration law by executive order, citizen children of parents whom the parents do not wish to take back to their home countries, were always put into foster homes and put up for adoption.  Trump has promised to countermand Obama's illegal executive orders with his own orders his first day in office. Parents that lose their children in this manner will most likely never see them again.

A notice to illgal aliens should make the law clear, and warn that neither activists nor lawyers can change the law:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/212.2

Donald Trump May Be Our Last-Gasp Hope of Freedom

Donald Trump is the only possible answer to the maleficent drift that the media has taken this country since the Eisenhower days.  The media manufactures all our heroes and villains and tell us what is politically correct.  Cowards, traitors, draft-dodgers and criminals have become paradigms of political correctness.  Social engineering by the communist-controlled media has developed the Millennials and their warped thought processes, or lack thereof. The communists have been in control of the media since the early 1960s,  and most people are not smart enough to throw off their yokes of stupidity, so they  keep electing subversives like Carter, Obama and Clinton.


Now almost all our federal district judges are liberal democrats.  Their social engineering has wrought unisex toilets, and they have approved abortion of third-trimester fetuses and the harvest of their body parts. 


Witness the Arizona District of the 9th U.S. Circuit, Court.  All 5 of the federal judges are not only democrats but minorities--except possibly one, a guy named "Tuchi," who is married to a Mexican-American. It is no wonder that Arizona has been overrun by crime, drug cartels and illegal aliens. The communist-controlled media is trying to destroy the only semblance of Arizona justice in the person of Joe Arpaio.


Nowadays, only Anglo-Americans qualify as the butts of all the jokes by the late-night comedians because the so-called, stand-up comedians are a gutless bunch of brown-nosing, politically-correct  hacks and wouldn't know true humor if it jumped up and bit them on their asses. If planted shills, canned laughter and cues did not tell the Pavlov-reflex Millennials when to laugh, the late-night shows would be out of business. When a nation loses its humor, it has lost its raison d'etre.


There is another small ray of hope for America.  The New York Times has been caught at what most of us have recognized for a long time.  They compose a best-seller list of books based upon what is more profitable to them and their corporate alliances--with designs upon making their chosen "best sellers" self-fulfilling.  True literary talent is obfuscated by the corporate media and can be found only by the truly passionate searcher--mostly in private blogs and self-publishing, over which the mass media has no control.  The giant media is trying desperately to maintain control over the ignorant minds that they have developed and extinguish the cyber ray of hope. Some conservatives hope, and even predict, that the New York Times and most of the large, brick-and-mortar publishing houses will sink into oblivion, perhaps as early as ten years from now.

Should Donald Trump Question the Impartiality of U.S. Judge Gonzalo Curiel?

Is Trump Justified in Questioning the Fairness of U.S. Judge Gonzalo Curiel?

…United States District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel, the man presiding over the class-action lawsuit against Trump University, is a member of the La Raza Lawyers of San Diego and oversaw the gift of a law school scholarship to an illegal alien….  Read more at:

 http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/#ixzz4AqgOWhQ0

Arizona is a paradigm of a border State being overrun by illegal aliens.  Former Governor Janet Napolitano (represented Anita Hill who filed that frivolous sexual harassment case against (later) SCOTUS Judge Clarence Thomas) who was the Head U.S. Attorney for the Arizona Federal Judicial District filed more charges against Border Patrolmen than she did narcotics  and/or  illegal alien traffickers.  Today every Federal Judge in the Arizona District is either a Clinton or Obama appointee.  and 100% of them are either a minority, or married to a minority. 

One Frank Zapata, now a Senior Judge (semi-retired) in Arizona, had just been appointed by Bill Clinton in 1996 when he heard a case of a young Hispanic male, I’ll refer to as ‘X,’ who had come to a border POE two years earlier just as it was closing in early 1994 and presented an Arizona Driver’s license and a Tucson High school ID as his “proof” of citizenship.  The DL showed him to be 18 months older than the school ID.  A computer check revealed that his father was an illegal alien under deportation proceedings for large-volume narcotics smuggling, and had just been released from Safford Federal Prison (Zapata’s Home town).  Inspection was deferred until the next day to give inspectors a chance to have his mother come to the POE to present an alleged birth certificate “proving” that he was a U.S. citizen. She lived more than an hour’s drive away and inspectors were not permitted to leave the POE open after closing hours at 9 p.m.  X had the option of driving some 20 miles to a 24/7 POE for immediate adjudication of his application for admission.  The applicant, X, refused to return to Mexico and had to be forcibly removed and turned over to Mexican customs authorities who determined that X was a Mexican citizen, at least through derivation, if not by birth.   The next day X’s lawyer went to every newspaper TV station, to Mexican Consuls in Tucson and Phoenix and expressed his outrage that X had not been admitted and claimed that his client had been assaulted by POE personnel. Every news media published the lawyer's  story as if it were gospel truth.  Federal Law has always required a U.S. passport for all applicants, citizens and aliens alike, at ports of entry, but the law had never been enforced.

The lawyer sued the Government for a substantial amount and after a couple of years (1996), the prosecution and defense (Government) met in Judge Zapata’s chambers for a “settlement” conference.  The Government always tries to settle these frivolous law suits out of court because of the time and expense (as well as the unpredictability of juries in civil cases).  The two litigating parties agreed on a modest amount and they signed an agreement (confidential).   After the agreement, Judge Zapata remarked that if he had been sitting on a jury judging the case, he would have given X the full amount the lawyer had originally asked for.  He added that he had two sons that frequently went to Mexico and he guaranteed them that they would never take a passport or a birth certificate with them to Mexico to prove their citizenship when returning to the U.S.

This case probably had something to do with the Government’s deciding to finally start enforcing the passport law (much to the chagrin of activist judges). .Who can blame Donald Trump for suspecting the impartiality of a judge Is Trump Justified in Questioning the Fairness of U.S. Judge Gonzalo Curiel?

…United States District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel, the man presiding over the class-action lawsuit against Trump University, is a member of the La Raza Lawyers of San Diego and oversaw the gift of a law school scholarship to an illegal alien….  Read more at:

 http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/#ixzz4AqgOWhQ0

Arizona is a paradigm of a border State being overrun by illegal aliens.  Former Governor Janet Napolitano (represented Anita Hill who filed that frivolous sexual harassment case against (later) SCOTUS Judge Clarence Thomas) who was the Head U.S. Attorney for the Arizona Federal Judicial District filed more charges against Border Patrolmen than she did narcotics  and/or  illegal alien traffickers.  Today every Federal Judge in the Arizona District is either a Clinton or Obama appointee.  and 100% of them are either a minority, or married to a minority. 

One Frank Zapata, now a Senior Judge (semi-retired) in Arizona, had just been appointed by Bill Clinton in 1996 when he heard a case of a young Hispanic male, I’ll refer to as ‘X,’ who had come to a border POE two years earlier just as it was closing in early 1994 and presented an Arizona Driver’s license and a Tucson High school ID as his “proof” of citizenship.  The DL showed him to be 18 months older than the school ID.  A computer check revealed that his father was an illegal alien under deportation proceedings for large-volume narcotics smuggling, and had just been released from Safford Federal Prison (Zapata’s Home town).  Inspection was deferred until the next day to give inspectors a chance to have his mother come to the POE to present an alleged birth certificate “proving” that he was a U.S. citizen. She lived more than an hour’s drive away and inspectors were not permitted to leave the POE open after closing hours at 9 p.m.  X had the option of driving some 20 miles to a 24/7 POE for immediate adjudication of his application for admission.  The applicant, X, refused to return to Mexico and had to be forcibly removed and turned over to Mexican customs authorities who determined that X was a Mexican citizen, at least through derivation, if not by birth.   The next day X’s lawyer went to every newspaper TV station, to Mexican Consuls in Tucson and Phoenix and expressed his outrage that X had not been admitted and claimed that his client had been assaulted by POE personnel. Every news media published the lawyer's  story as if it were gospel truth.  Federal Law has always required a U.S. passport for all applicants, citizens and aliens alike, at ports of entry, but the law had never been enforced.

The lawyer sued the Government for a substantial amount and after a couple of years (1996), the prosecution and defense (Government) met in Judge Zapata’s chambers for a “settlement” conference.  The Government always tries to settle these frivolous law suits out of court because of the time and expense (as well as the unpredictability of juries in civil cases).  The two litigating parties agreed on a modest amount and they signed an agreement (confidential).   After the agreement, Judge Zapata told the defending U.S. attorneys that if he had been sitting on a jury judging the case, he would have given X the full amount the lawyer had originally asked for.  He added that he had two sons that frequently went to Mexico and he guaranteed them that they would never take a passport or a birth certificate with them to Mexico to prove their citizenship when returning to the U.S.

This case probably had something to do with the Government’s deciding to finally start enforcing the passport law (much to the chagrin of activist judges). In that respect it was beneficial, but Judge Zapata’s bias was obvious.Who can blame Donald Trump for suspecting the impartiality of an Hispanic judge since many of them were lawyer activists (like Gonzalo Curiel, member of La Raza Lawyers of San Diego)Is Trump Justified in Questioning the Fairness of U.S. Judge Gonzalo Curiel?

…United States District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel, the man presiding over the class-action lawsuit against Trump University, is a member of the La Raza Lawyers of San Diego and oversaw the gift of a law school scholarship to an illegal alien….  Read more at:

 http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/#ixzz4AqgOWhQ0

Arizona is a paradigm of a border State overrun by illegal aliens, and today every Federal Judge in the Arizona District is either a Clinton or Obama appointee.  and 100% of them are either a minority, or married to a minority. 

One Frank Zapata, now a Senior Judge (semi-retired) in Arizona, had just been appointed by Bill Clinton in 1996 when he was assigned to hear oversee a case of a young Hispanic male, I’ll refer to as ‘X,’ who had come to a border POE two years earlier just as it was closing in early 1994 and presented an Arizona Driver’s license and a Tucson High school ID as his “proof” of citizenship.  The DL showed him to be 18 months older than the school ID.  A computer check revealed that his father was an illegal alien under deportation proceedings for large-volume narcotics smuggling, and had just been released from Safford Federal Prison (Zapata’s Home town).  Inspection was deferred until the next day to give inspectors a chance to have his mother come to the POE to present an alleged birth certificate “proving” that he was a U.S. citizen. She lived more than an hour’s drive away and inspectors were not permitted to leave the POE open after closing hours at 9 p.m.  X had the option of driving some 20 miles to a 24/7 POE for immediate adjudication of his application for admission.  The applicant, X, refused to return to Mexico and had to be forcibly removed and turned over to Mexican customs authorities who determined that X was a Mexican citizen, at least through derivation, if not by birth.   The next day X’s lawyer went to every newspaper TV station, to Mexican Consuls in Tucson and Phoenix and expressed his outrage that X had not been admitted and claimed that his client had been assaulted by POE personnel. Every news media published the lawyer's  story as if it were gospel truth.  Federal Law has always required a U.S. passport for all applicants, citizens and aliens alike, at ports of entry, but the law had never been enforced.

The lawyer sued the Government for a substantial amount and after a couple of years (1996), the prosecution and defense (Government) met in Judge Zapata’s chambers for a “settlement” conference.  The Government always tries to settle these frivolous law suits out of court because of the time and expense (as well as the unpredictability of juries in civil cases).  The two litigating parties agreed on a modest amount and they signed an agreement (confidential).   After the agreement, Judge Zapata told the defending U.S. attorneys that if he had been sitting on a jury judging the case, he would have given X the full amount the lawyer had originally asked for.  He added that he had two sons that frequently went to Mexico and he guaranteed them that they would never take a passport or a birth certificate with them to Mexico to prove their citizenship when returning to the U.S.

This case probably had something to do with the Government’s deciding to finally start enforcing the passport law (much to the chagrin of activist judges). In that respect it was beneficial, but in view of the foregoing, who can blame Donald Trump for suspecting the impartiality of an Hispanic judge since some are members or organizations like La Raza 

Why So Many Women Political Leaders Fear Immigration Law Enforcement

When I was working on my degree in creative writing at the University of Texas at El Paso in the early 1970s, an instructor, not long removed from the State of New York, once suggested a subject for writing projects.  How about  maids? he asked.  "Have you noticed that nearly everyone in El Paso has a maid? In New York if someone has a maid, they probably live on Park Avenue or some other rich section of the city." As an immigration officer, I had knowledge that would have embarrassed the instructor.  I could have told him that nearly all the maids in El Paso were working illegally in violation of immigration laws.

Up to the early 1960s, the INS (forerunner to ICE, a branch of the DHS now charged with enforcing immigration laws) still "worked" illegal maids.  Before the 1960s we used to investigate information regarding employment of an illegal maid in a household.  Sometimes we would nab them without information while they were working in the front yards of their employers' homes. By the mid 1960s, the INS had practically quit working illgal maids.  There were two reasons: first, they were low priority and second, they nearly always caused a big scene because the employers were so to desperately dependent upon them. Illegal maids were essential to maintaining their facade of an exalted lifestyle, A single woman could lose a few days work while trying to find another maid. A legal one would cost five times what she paid the illegal one, and what's more, be less dependable and subservient.  They usually would up hiring the same one, or another illegal one, within a few days.  I cannot recall an employer of an illegal maid ever being fined or prosecuted for that reason alone. 

 Many of these illegal maids were in possession of so-called border crossing cards (Form I-186) that permitted them to cross legally in the U.S. for shopping or visiting for a period not to exceed 72 hours.  However, it was one of the most abused privileges in the history of American immigration laws and a border crossing card was essential for most illegal maids.  A few, however, waded the river or entered by walking across the line in New Mexico .  When I was in the Army, I can remember  low-ranking married enlisted men of Fort Bliss, near El Paso, who lived off post bragged of having maids. These maids migrate to Juarez from small towns and large cities some distance from the border and a job that includes room, board and a small salary is manna from heaven compared to what they had in their impoverished villages in Mexico. The INS discontinued the Form I-186 in favor of a regular immigration visa soem time around the turn of the century (around 2000 AD).

By the 1970s, the hiring of illegal maids had become common,,not solely along the border, but across the nation. That was when we started hearing stories of uppity women in politics having to withdraw their names from nomination to important government positions due to being exposed as employers of illegal aliens.  Bill Clinton's first two nominees for the position of Attorney General had to withdraw due to having illegal maids.They were Zoe Baird and District Judge Kimba Wood of New York.  Linda Chavez, once a prominent Republican politician quickly sank into oblivion when it was discovered that she had a female working for in her home that was illegally in the country. Chavez claimed she was just "helping" the lady who was having some domestic problems with a spouse. but the public did not buy that spin.

Most women in the United States that are actively involved in politics have a morbid fear of an immigration clean-up like the one that occurred in the U.S. in 1954.  One of the major reasons is that so many of them exploit illegal immigration by hiring illegal maids to run their households.  The chores of illegal maids include making beds,  cooking, baby and being a nanny for the children of Middle class Americans, especially single women run households.  Many of these female politicians are living beyond their means and having a lowly-paid illegal maid is essential to freeing her up to be active in politics or active in the workplace outside the home--as a high-paid employee, or as the owner of a small business.  Thus, the illegal maid is essential to casting an image that would belie her economic means if the truth were known.

The Kentucky Rowan County Clerk vs. Same Sex Marriage

Comments

Sort by

Top

She prostituted herself by taking a job that conflicted with her religious beliefs. Public service is NOT the place to demonstrate. Only a demented person would try to use a civil service job as a platform to demonstrate her beliefs. She is a Democrat and they are trying to palm her off as an anomaly when she perfectly well demonstrates Democrats' habit of abusing their authority--from President (the IRS and his former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton), all the way down to the lowly county clerk. Donald Trump does not believe in citizenship rights for anchor babies, but he has not proposed refusing to issue them birth certificates. You petition llegislators to change laws you do not like; you do not punish a segment of the population whose beliefs conflict with yours as a public servant. Jail is her proper place.