Posts
The proposed Border Wall is a waste of money. The U.S. could have stopped illegal immigration dead in its tracks a hundred years ago with a national ID like Mexico has. Anyone gainfully employed in that country has one. That right-to-work I.D. document is called the Cedula de Profesion. It is like our Social Security Card, except that it hasa photo ID and other security enhancements. Our social security card can be easily reproduced with a copy machine--but just memorizing the number is as good as possessing the unlaminated, card-stock, paper document issued by the Government. Legal workers in Mexico also have free medical care with their exclusive, government-owned Hospitales de Seguro Social. These are full-service hostpitals restricted to use by legally-employed citizens. That is the reason that Mexican ambulances continue to bring their sick and injured across the border to the U.S. hospitals that are designated to accept indigent patients. There are few independent, full-service hospitals in Mexico.
We won't ever have a national ID because organized crime does not want it. It would be a threat to their lateral mobility, anonymity and ability to easily change their identity or steal someone else's. Our populace,. as a whole, are dumbed down in education and so profoundly duped by political correctness that they cannot objectively judge anything they see, hear or read. Political correctness, impressment of the media by organized crime, and the media exaltation of "diversity" are strategies of the e litists to keep the general population suppressed.. If you do not understand how that can happen, read the George Orwell novel, "1984."
Most of the illegal aliens that come here are illiterate peons that would be a drag on any society, but naturally, they prefer ours because, with welfare, they can live as well as those legal, professional wage-earners in Mexico who invested a lot of time and money in education and training.
The U.S. Government has always been a co-conspirator in illegal immigration. The new Administration is no different from any of the past 60 years. Trump's immigratin programs are nothing more than window dressing. The Wall sounds good, and so does rounding up CRIMINAL aliens. Unfortunately, in effect, the Government has re-defined illegal immigration, such as that practiced by the Dreamers, their extended famiies, and condoned by our Government.. Notwithstanding, It is still a felony:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325
In WWII most farm labor in the Midwest was performed by POWs from Europe. As long as welfare pays more than the minimim wage, there will be no incentive for legal workers to seek employment in the U.S. Employers use that as an excuse for hiring illegal aliens. Abundant welfare and low wages make that excuse a self-fulfilling prophesy. The only way to cure that excuse would be to raise the minimum wage to about $18.00 per hour, or decrease welfare to a such a low level (for the able-bodied) that it would incentivise working for a living.
We are now bordering on anarchy and violence that military intrervention will eventually become inevitable, unless we want another Bastille-type Revolution. The only impediment would be a national identiy card and strict adherence to the law by employees and employers, severe penalties for violators. The window of opportunity for that option is rapidly diasppearing. We SHOULD be concerned about Russian spy-ships lurking just off our shore. When aircraft carriers and troop ships start showing up, it might be an incentive for most aliens to go home, but some, the fifth-columnists that now riot in the streets, will mysteriously stay behind.
Tuesday, February 14, 2017
Saturday, February 11, 2017
President Trump May Re-Write and Re-issue His Executive Order on the "ban."
President Trump's executive order concerning the intensive vetting of aliens from problem countries in the Middle East will probably be resubmitted next week and the so-called ban re-instated.
Obama had Chief Justice John Roberts as his personal secretary to do the re-writing of his Obamacare, then along with the other SCOTUS members passed it into law. Blacks ordinarily get a pass on many mistakes but the courts jumped through their proverbial derrieres to make America's first black president a success because...well, because he was America's first black president.
Trump does not have the luxury of the courts coddling him like they did Obama. He is therefore vulnerable to the courts' quibbling and pettifogging his every action, their aiding and abetting the left wing activists, fifth-columnist opponents of law and order and the advocates of anarchy.
Trump should have paid more attention to hiring experts in immigration law, particularly in the fields of examinations and exclusions. Examiners have to write publishable reports of every denial, backing it up with quoted law and precedent decisions. The best are not lawyers because the vagaries of immigration law are intimidating and they must depend upon impoverished clients, or such organizations as the Legal Aid Society or other charitable sources for their fees.
Immigration Examiners historically worked their way up though the Border Patrol and other divisions of immigration law enforcement. A few enjoyed encyclopedic memories and the faculty of instant recall. Such skills are now blunted by computers, and I believe, make one mentally lazy.
Most of those "immigration experts" on Trump's staff seem to have been mostly involved in the physical round-up aspect of immigration law enforcement, without in-depth learning in immigration law. Trump should not have ignored the learned, self-taught specialists. It is hard to conceive, but a few years ago some, if not most, of the real experts in immigration law were also "cowboys" early in their immigration law enforcement careers. Going from the Border Patrol to Immigration Examinations was an unsettling experience. When I applied for that job in 1975, I went from Fort Hancock, Texas to Los Angeles. I had just received my degree in English, and I was later told that that was the reason I was selected. I later learned that the job would require mountains of typewritten reports on my personal adjudications of all sorts of applications for a wide array of immigration benefits, but mostly for permanent residence in the U.S. Many such benefits required the applicant to possess certain skills, from doctors to rocket scientists. Some applicants were movie actors and others were professional athletes. Soon after arrival in L.A. District Office, I was detailed to the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) for advance training.
Former President Reagan started appointing big campaign contributors, such as Howard Ezell, former Weinerschnitzel CEO, to such powerful decision-making jobs as Southwest Regional Commissioner of the INS. Such "outsiders" tended to promote sycophants with no regard for merit. In the late 1980s the old INS became just another trove of political spoils. Ezell, seemingly a frustrated, wannabe law-man, liked to go out on raids with enforcement personnel andactually chase the (always) fleeing aliens. Instead of battling the open- border advocates, President Reagan eventually caved in and signed on to the biggest immigration amnesty in history (IRCA, in 1986).
For the first time ever, last night I found myself agreeing with Geraldo Rivera. He said that Trump's executive order (on the so-called ban) was "bush league" in the way it was written. Indeed, it was dead in the water before it got off the ground. Trump is in bad need of some real immigration experts to combat the lurking vultures of left-wing opposition in the courts. If I were young again, I might volunteer to help without compensation, but advancing age and declining energy, now forbid it.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/white-house-rewriting-trump-s-controversial-travel-ban-order-sources-n719356
Obama had Chief Justice John Roberts as his personal secretary to do the re-writing of his Obamacare, then along with the other SCOTUS members passed it into law. Blacks ordinarily get a pass on many mistakes but the courts jumped through their proverbial derrieres to make America's first black president a success because...well, because he was America's first black president.
Trump does not have the luxury of the courts coddling him like they did Obama. He is therefore vulnerable to the courts' quibbling and pettifogging his every action, their aiding and abetting the left wing activists, fifth-columnist opponents of law and order and the advocates of anarchy.
Trump should have paid more attention to hiring experts in immigration law, particularly in the fields of examinations and exclusions. Examiners have to write publishable reports of every denial, backing it up with quoted law and precedent decisions. The best are not lawyers because the vagaries of immigration law are intimidating and they must depend upon impoverished clients, or such organizations as the Legal Aid Society or other charitable sources for their fees.
Immigration Examiners historically worked their way up though the Border Patrol and other divisions of immigration law enforcement. A few enjoyed encyclopedic memories and the faculty of instant recall. Such skills are now blunted by computers, and I believe, make one mentally lazy.
Most of those "immigration experts" on Trump's staff seem to have been mostly involved in the physical round-up aspect of immigration law enforcement, without in-depth learning in immigration law. Trump should not have ignored the learned, self-taught specialists. It is hard to conceive, but a few years ago some, if not most, of the real experts in immigration law were also "cowboys" early in their immigration law enforcement careers. Going from the Border Patrol to Immigration Examinations was an unsettling experience. When I applied for that job in 1975, I went from Fort Hancock, Texas to Los Angeles. I had just received my degree in English, and I was later told that that was the reason I was selected. I later learned that the job would require mountains of typewritten reports on my personal adjudications of all sorts of applications for a wide array of immigration benefits, but mostly for permanent residence in the U.S. Many such benefits required the applicant to possess certain skills, from doctors to rocket scientists. Some applicants were movie actors and others were professional athletes. Soon after arrival in L.A. District Office, I was detailed to the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) for advance training.
Former President Reagan started appointing big campaign contributors, such as Howard Ezell, former Weinerschnitzel CEO, to such powerful decision-making jobs as Southwest Regional Commissioner of the INS. Such "outsiders" tended to promote sycophants with no regard for merit. In the late 1980s the old INS became just another trove of political spoils. Ezell, seemingly a frustrated, wannabe law-man, liked to go out on raids with enforcement personnel andactually chase the (always) fleeing aliens. Instead of battling the open- border advocates, President Reagan eventually caved in and signed on to the biggest immigration amnesty in history (IRCA, in 1986).
For the first time ever, last night I found myself agreeing with Geraldo Rivera. He said that Trump's executive order (on the so-called ban) was "bush league" in the way it was written. Indeed, it was dead in the water before it got off the ground. Trump is in bad need of some real immigration experts to combat the lurking vultures of left-wing opposition in the courts. If I were young again, I might volunteer to help without compensation, but advancing age and declining energy, now forbid it.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/white-house-rewriting-trump-s-controversial-travel-ban-order-sources-n719356
Thursday, January 19, 2017
The Firing of Megyn Kelly From Fox News
As a lawyer, Megyn Kelly should know the difference between
a question and a statement. Her
statement to Trump at the first debate was a lengthy, poorly disguised, barrage
of embarrassing questions with predicated conclusions that highlighted her
hostile opinion, but not necessarily facts.
She wanted to turn the debate into the Megyn Kelly coming-out show. She gambled her career on her effort to
destroy Trump. She had hoped to win the
gamble and send her esteem among women activists soaring and become the hero of
an over-estimated "feminine movement". She must have felt that as a member of the
media, she could rely on all the other networks to join her smear of
Trump. They did, but the days of the
corrupt mainstream media bamboozling the majority is at an end.
The more the mainstream media tries to destroy someone, like
Trump, the stronger they make him. If women, or other minorities, want to get
involved in politics, from now on they must be able to stand the heat. With the
departure of Obama, we slough off the paranoia of criticizing any minority
politician, without a hint of a racial slur, yet still being called a
racist. Color became the King's X of
immunity from criticism, even if the criticism is dead on and right. The only good I can see coming out of the
Obama years is the awakening of the American male and restoring his
manhood. It will no longer be noble to
bow down before those inferior in intellect and ability. We have confused noblesse oblige with
cowardice and the latter has made us take a back seat to the mentally
challenged politicians running for office.
We have learned how needlessly skittish we had become of making any kind
of critical remark against any kind of minority.
Our career politicians paid the price of their spinelessness
by acquiescing to the election of a president totally at odds with American
culture and American values. Good
riddance to him and our paranoia. The Tea party is here to stay and we will, we
must, make it stronger. Anyone is
welcome as long as they are conservative, honest and have a firm grip on
reality. There is no room for career demagogues, the lazy and the phonies whose
only skill is a loud mouth and the ability to rouse the rabble with false
claims of oppression. .
Monday, November 14, 2016
Kumbaya and Liberal Mental Illness
Just how sick a lot of liberals have become is a sobering experience which has come to the fore more blatantly after the Trump election. They have been oriented the past eight years in liberal thought and all the litanies that fly in the face of logic and common sense. There are pervasive mass neuroses afoot. Some reveal much deeper psychological problems, such as sociopath personality. These are the most dangerous kind, because like Judas goats, they can lead the weaker minds to their destruction.
After every Marxist conquest, there follows an intensive government re-education program that orients former opponents to accept their doctrine and to accept the conquest. There, the potential troublemakers are weeded out and confined in political prisons where most will never be seen again. The free world and true democracy does not do that, which means that the sick minds will go on, , preferably in a dormant condition that decays into oblivion, now that their leader of the past eight. years is going to be out of power. College students are captive audiences of wacky college professors, some of them extremists; Bill Ayers is a good example. These students are especially vulnerable because warped-brain college professors make them mental automatons. They manipulate these students into doing their bidding while they, like puppeteers, keep a safe distance. Most of those students will never be able to tap into the superego, that part of the brain that Nietzsche was talking about when he talked about the Overman; man or woman that overcome themselves --mankind's greatest obstacle--and becomes a superman. That lofty goal is even more difficult when present social engineering is designed to keep them moving along with the herd.
The rest of us do not have to tolerate these people when they get too far out of line. We have a duty to do our part in seeing to it that the U.S. recovers from its brief excursion into Obama-thought; i.e., Marxism. Before they are finished, it might take a scene like Kent State, or Watts, to sober them up. The state governors should refuse to send the National Guard anywhere they do not have the authority of martial law, and martial law quickly sobers up the unruly. The National Guardsmen and women were never meant to be scarecrows, or fodder for brickbats and other thrown objects. Too far out of line means outside the confines of the law, and they should be dealt with accordingly. Good citizens need to cooperate with law enforcement to get the misguided back on the right track--by force when they become threats to the peace and tranquility of the community. Many of these people already have criminal records because they are not the types that easily conform to the rules of society. The contrast between them and your ordinary criminal is merely a matter of semantics. The narcissism and egos of sociopaths demand popular attention, but the worst error of society would be to pander to, or even humor, them. They need to take the hard knocks that they earn and own the consequences of their conduct and obstinacy. We do not expect them to learn or change; but we have a duty to marginalize them and keep them from disrupting our right to peace and tranquility.
After every Marxist conquest, there follows an intensive government re-education program that orients former opponents to accept their doctrine and to accept the conquest. There, the potential troublemakers are weeded out and confined in political prisons where most will never be seen again. The free world and true democracy does not do that, which means that the sick minds will go on, , preferably in a dormant condition that decays into oblivion, now that their leader of the past eight. years is going to be out of power. College students are captive audiences of wacky college professors, some of them extremists; Bill Ayers is a good example. These students are especially vulnerable because warped-brain college professors make them mental automatons. They manipulate these students into doing their bidding while they, like puppeteers, keep a safe distance. Most of those students will never be able to tap into the superego, that part of the brain that Nietzsche was talking about when he talked about the Overman; man or woman that overcome themselves --mankind's greatest obstacle--and becomes a superman. That lofty goal is even more difficult when present social engineering is designed to keep them moving along with the herd.
The rest of us do not have to tolerate these people when they get too far out of line. We have a duty to do our part in seeing to it that the U.S. recovers from its brief excursion into Obama-thought; i.e., Marxism. Before they are finished, it might take a scene like Kent State, or Watts, to sober them up. The state governors should refuse to send the National Guard anywhere they do not have the authority of martial law, and martial law quickly sobers up the unruly. The National Guardsmen and women were never meant to be scarecrows, or fodder for brickbats and other thrown objects. Too far out of line means outside the confines of the law, and they should be dealt with accordingly. Good citizens need to cooperate with law enforcement to get the misguided back on the right track--by force when they become threats to the peace and tranquility of the community. Many of these people already have criminal records because they are not the types that easily conform to the rules of society. The contrast between them and your ordinary criminal is merely a matter of semantics. The narcissism and egos of sociopaths demand popular attention, but the worst error of society would be to pander to, or even humor, them. They need to take the hard knocks that they earn and own the consequences of their conduct and obstinacy. We do not expect them to learn or change; but we have a duty to marginalize them and keep them from disrupting our right to peace and tranquility.
Thursday, November 10, 2016
Deportation Proceedings Made Easy
I think that the Trump Administration will be fair and warn those here illegally that they will jeopardize their chances of immigrating legally to the U.S. if they wait to be formally deported, rather than return to their home countries voluntarily, to apply for a legal visa. Activists and some shyster lawyers might jeopardize an alien's chances of immigrating legally, if they advise him/her to wait and be formally deported. The DHS, under Trump, will probably have printed up some handbills and publish warnings and information in Spanish and English on the Internet, on TV and in newspapers. The information addressed to illegal aliens, should warn them that if they wait for deportation, they must, after formal deporation, wait a minimum of five years just to apply for a visa. There is no guarantee that they will then get one in five years, because Trump has proposed lowering immigration quotas, something that is long overdue.
Aliens under formal deportation proceedings do not have a right to release on bond and Appearance Bonds are rarely granted. The aliens can be detained for as long as it takes for them to appear before an immigration judge. This cannot be emphasized too much: Illegal alien parents that think that theirchidren born here (anchor babies) will give them immunity against deportation are wrong. (See Matter of Melendez, Interim Dec. #2539, dated 10/20/1976 and others referenced in this decision)
Before Obama tried to make a new immigration law by executive order, citizen children of parents whom the parents do not wish to take back to their home countries, were always put into foster homes and put up for adoption. Trump has promised to countermand Obama's illegal executive orders with his own orders his first day in office. Parents that lose their children in this manner will most likely never see them again.
A notice to illgal aliens should make the law clear, and warn that neither activists nor lawyers can change the law:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/212.2
Aliens under formal deportation proceedings do not have a right to release on bond and Appearance Bonds are rarely granted. The aliens can be detained for as long as it takes for them to appear before an immigration judge. This cannot be emphasized too much: Illegal alien parents that think that theirchidren born here (anchor babies) will give them immunity against deportation are wrong. (See Matter of Melendez, Interim Dec. #2539, dated 10/20/1976 and others referenced in this decision)
Before Obama tried to make a new immigration law by executive order, citizen children of parents whom the parents do not wish to take back to their home countries, were always put into foster homes and put up for adoption. Trump has promised to countermand Obama's illegal executive orders with his own orders his first day in office. Parents that lose their children in this manner will most likely never see them again.
A notice to illgal aliens should make the law clear, and warn that neither activists nor lawyers can change the law:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/212.2
Monday, June 13, 2016
Donald Trump May Be Our Last-Gasp Hope of Freedom
Donald Trump is the only possible answer to the maleficent drift that the media has taken this country since the Eisenhower days. The media manufactures all our heroes and villains and tell us what is politically correct. Cowards, traitors, draft-dodgers and criminals have become paradigms of political correctness. Social engineering by the communist-controlled media has developed the Millennials and their warped thought processes, or lack thereof. The communists have been in control of the media since the early 1960s, and most people are not smart enough to throw off their yokes of stupidity, so they keep electing subversives like Carter, Obama and Clinton.
Now almost all our federal district judges are liberal democrats. Their social engineering has wrought unisex toilets, and they have approved abortion of third-trimester fetuses and the harvest of their body parts.
Witness the Arizona District of the 9th U.S. Circuit, Court. All 5 of the federal judges are not only democrats but minorities--except possibly one, a guy named "Tuchi," who is married to a Mexican-American. It is no wonder that Arizona has been overrun by crime, drug cartels and illegal aliens. The communist-controlled media is trying to destroy the only semblance of Arizona justice in the person of Joe Arpaio.
Nowadays, only Anglo-Americans qualify as the butts of all the jokes by the late-night comedians because the so-called, stand-up comedians are a gutless bunch of brown-nosing, politically-correct hacks and wouldn't know true humor if it jumped up and bit them on their asses. If planted shills, canned laughter and cues did not tell the Pavlov-reflex Millennials when to laugh, the late-night shows would be out of business. When a nation loses its humor, it has lost its raison d'etre.
There is another small ray of hope for America. The New York Times has been caught at what most of us have recognized for a long time. They compose a best-seller list of books based upon what is more profitable to them and their corporate alliances--with designs upon making their chosen "best sellers" self-fulfilling. True literary talent is obfuscated by the corporate media and can be found only by the truly passionate searcher--mostly in private blogs and self-publishing, over which the mass media has no control. The giant media is trying desperately to maintain control over the ignorant minds that they have developed and extinguish the cyber ray of hope. Some conservatives hope, and even predict, that the New York Times and most of the large, brick-and-mortar publishing houses will sink into oblivion, perhaps as early as ten years from now.
Now almost all our federal district judges are liberal democrats. Their social engineering has wrought unisex toilets, and they have approved abortion of third-trimester fetuses and the harvest of their body parts.
Witness the Arizona District of the 9th U.S. Circuit, Court. All 5 of the federal judges are not only democrats but minorities--except possibly one, a guy named "Tuchi," who is married to a Mexican-American. It is no wonder that Arizona has been overrun by crime, drug cartels and illegal aliens. The communist-controlled media is trying to destroy the only semblance of Arizona justice in the person of Joe Arpaio.
Nowadays, only Anglo-Americans qualify as the butts of all the jokes by the late-night comedians because the so-called, stand-up comedians are a gutless bunch of brown-nosing, politically-correct hacks and wouldn't know true humor if it jumped up and bit them on their asses. If planted shills, canned laughter and cues did not tell the Pavlov-reflex Millennials when to laugh, the late-night shows would be out of business. When a nation loses its humor, it has lost its raison d'etre.
There is another small ray of hope for America. The New York Times has been caught at what most of us have recognized for a long time. They compose a best-seller list of books based upon what is more profitable to them and their corporate alliances--with designs upon making their chosen "best sellers" self-fulfilling. True literary talent is obfuscated by the corporate media and can be found only by the truly passionate searcher--mostly in private blogs and self-publishing, over which the mass media has no control. The giant media is trying desperately to maintain control over the ignorant minds that they have developed and extinguish the cyber ray of hope. Some conservatives hope, and even predict, that the New York Times and most of the large, brick-and-mortar publishing houses will sink into oblivion, perhaps as early as ten years from now.
Monday, June 6, 2016
Should Donald Trump Question the Impartiality of U.S. Judge Gonzalo Curiel?
Is Trump Justified in Questioning the Fairness of U.S. Judge
Gonzalo Curiel?
…United States District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel, the man
presiding over the class-action lawsuit against Trump University, is a member
of the La Raza Lawyers of San Diego and oversaw the gift of a law school
scholarship to an illegal alien…. Read
more at:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/#ixzz4AqgOWhQ0
Arizona is a paradigm of a border State being overrun by
illegal aliens. Former Governor Janet
Napolitano (represented Anita Hill who filed that frivolous sexual harassment
case against (later) SCOTUS Judge Clarence Thomas) who was the Head U.S.
Attorney for the Arizona Federal Judicial District filed more charges against
Border Patrolmen than she did narcotics
and/or illegal alien traffickers. Today every Federal Judge in the Arizona
District is either a Clinton or Obama appointee. and 100% of them are either a minority, or
married to a minority.
One Frank Zapata, now a Senior Judge (semi-retired) in
Arizona, had just been appointed by Bill Clinton in 1996 when he heard a case
of a young Hispanic male, I’ll refer to as ‘X,’ who had come to a border POE
two years earlier just as it was closing in early 1994 and presented an Arizona
Driver’s license and a Tucson High school ID as his “proof” of
citizenship. The DL showed him to be 18
months older than the school ID. A
computer check revealed that his father was an illegal alien under deportation
proceedings for large-volume narcotics smuggling, and had just been released
from Safford Federal Prison (Zapata’s Home town). Inspection was deferred until the next day to
give inspectors a chance to have his mother come to the POE to present an
alleged birth certificate “proving” that he was a U.S. citizen. She lived more
than an hour’s drive away and inspectors were not permitted to leave the POE
open after closing hours at 9 p.m. X had
the option of driving some 20 miles to a 24/7 POE for immediate adjudication of
his application for admission. The
applicant, X, refused to return to Mexico and had to be forcibly removed and
turned over to Mexican customs authorities who determined that X was a Mexican
citizen, at least through derivation, if not by birth. The next day X’s lawyer went to every
newspaper TV station, to Mexican Consuls in Tucson and Phoenix and expressed his
outrage that X had not been admitted and claimed that his client had been
assaulted by POE personnel. Every news media published the lawyer's story as if it were gospel truth. Federal Law has always required a U.S.
passport for all applicants, citizens and aliens alike, at ports of entry, but
the law had never been enforced.
The lawyer sued the Government for a substantial amount and
after a couple of years (1996), the prosecution and defense (Government) met in
Judge Zapata’s chambers for a “settlement” conference. The Government always tries to settle these
frivolous law suits out of court because of the time and expense (as well as
the unpredictability of juries in civil cases).
The two litigating parties agreed on a modest amount and they signed an
agreement (confidential). After the agreement,
Judge Zapata remarked that if he had been sitting on a
jury judging the case, he would have given X the full amount the lawyer had
originally asked for. He added that he
had two sons that frequently went to Mexico and he guaranteed them that they
would never take a passport or a birth certificate with them to Mexico to prove
their citizenship when returning to the U.S.
This case probably had something to do with the Government’s
deciding to finally start enforcing the passport law (much to the chagrin of
activist judges). .Who can blame Donald Trump for suspecting the impartiality of a judge Is Trump Justified in Questioning the Fairness of U.S. Judge
Gonzalo Curiel?
…United States District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel, the man
presiding over the class-action lawsuit against Trump University, is a member
of the La Raza Lawyers of San Diego and oversaw the gift of a law school
scholarship to an illegal alien…. Read
more at:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/#ixzz4AqgOWhQ0
Arizona is a paradigm of a border State being overrun by
illegal aliens. Former Governor Janet
Napolitano (represented Anita Hill who filed that frivolous sexual harassment
case against (later) SCOTUS Judge Clarence Thomas) who was the Head U.S.
Attorney for the Arizona Federal Judicial District filed more charges against
Border Patrolmen than she did narcotics
and/or illegal alien traffickers. Today every Federal Judge in the Arizona
District is either a Clinton or Obama appointee. and 100% of them are either a minority, or
married to a minority.
One Frank Zapata, now a Senior Judge (semi-retired) in
Arizona, had just been appointed by Bill Clinton in 1996 when he heard a case
of a young Hispanic male, I’ll refer to as ‘X,’ who had come to a border POE
two years earlier just as it was closing in early 1994 and presented an Arizona
Driver’s license and a Tucson High school ID as his “proof” of
citizenship. The DL showed him to be 18
months older than the school ID. A
computer check revealed that his father was an illegal alien under deportation
proceedings for large-volume narcotics smuggling, and had just been released
from Safford Federal Prison (Zapata’s Home town). Inspection was deferred until the next day to
give inspectors a chance to have his mother come to the POE to present an
alleged birth certificate “proving” that he was a U.S. citizen. She lived more
than an hour’s drive away and inspectors were not permitted to leave the POE
open after closing hours at 9 p.m. X had
the option of driving some 20 miles to a 24/7 POE for immediate adjudication of
his application for admission. The
applicant, X, refused to return to Mexico and had to be forcibly removed and
turned over to Mexican customs authorities who determined that X was a Mexican
citizen, at least through derivation, if not by birth. The next day X’s lawyer went to every
newspaper TV station, to Mexican Consuls in Tucson and Phoenix and expressed his
outrage that X had not been admitted and claimed that his client had been
assaulted by POE personnel. Every news media published the lawyer's story as if it were gospel truth. Federal Law has always required a U.S.
passport for all applicants, citizens and aliens alike, at ports of entry, but
the law had never been enforced.
The lawyer sued the Government for a substantial amount and
after a couple of years (1996), the prosecution and defense (Government) met in
Judge Zapata’s chambers for a “settlement” conference. The Government always tries to settle these
frivolous law suits out of court because of the time and expense (as well as
the unpredictability of juries in civil cases).
The two litigating parties agreed on a modest amount and they signed an
agreement (confidential). After the agreement,
Judge Zapata told the defending U.S. attorneys that if he had been sitting on a
jury judging the case, he would have given X the full amount the lawyer had
originally asked for. He added that he
had two sons that frequently went to Mexico and he guaranteed them that they
would never take a passport or a birth certificate with them to Mexico to prove
their citizenship when returning to the U.S.
…United States District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel, the man
presiding over the class-action lawsuit against Trump University, is a member
of the La Raza Lawyers of San Diego and oversaw the gift of a law school
scholarship to an illegal alien…. Read
more at:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/#ixzz4AqgOWhQ0
Arizona is a paradigm of a border State overrun by
illegal aliens, and today every Federal Judge in the Arizona
District is either a Clinton or Obama appointee. and 100% of them are either a minority, or
married to a minority.
One Frank Zapata, now a Senior Judge (semi-retired) in
Arizona, had just been appointed by Bill Clinton in 1996 when he was assigned to hear oversee a case
of a young Hispanic male, I’ll refer to as ‘X,’ who had come to a border POE
two years earlier just as it was closing in early 1994 and presented an Arizona
Driver’s license and a Tucson High school ID as his “proof” of
citizenship. The DL showed him to be 18
months older than the school ID. A
computer check revealed that his father was an illegal alien under deportation
proceedings for large-volume narcotics smuggling, and had just been released
from Safford Federal Prison (Zapata’s Home town). Inspection was deferred until the next day to
give inspectors a chance to have his mother come to the POE to present an
alleged birth certificate “proving” that he was a U.S. citizen. She lived more
than an hour’s drive away and inspectors were not permitted to leave the POE
open after closing hours at 9 p.m. X had
the option of driving some 20 miles to a 24/7 POE for immediate adjudication of
his application for admission. The
applicant, X, refused to return to Mexico and had to be forcibly removed and
turned over to Mexican customs authorities who determined that X was a Mexican
citizen, at least through derivation, if not by birth. The next day X’s lawyer went to every
newspaper TV station, to Mexican Consuls in Tucson and Phoenix and expressed his
outrage that X had not been admitted and claimed that his client had been
assaulted by POE personnel. Every news media published the lawyer's story as if it were gospel truth. Federal Law has always required a U.S.
passport for all applicants, citizens and aliens alike, at ports of entry, but
the law had never been enforced.
The lawyer sued the Government for a substantial amount and
after a couple of years (1996), the prosecution and defense (Government) met in
Judge Zapata’s chambers for a “settlement” conference. The Government always tries to settle these
frivolous law suits out of court because of the time and expense (as well as
the unpredictability of juries in civil cases).
The two litigating parties agreed on a modest amount and they signed an
agreement (confidential). After the agreement,
Judge Zapata told the defending U.S. attorneys that if he had been sitting on a
jury judging the case, he would have given X the full amount the lawyer had
originally asked for. He added that he
had two sons that frequently went to Mexico and he guaranteed them that they
would never take a passport or a birth certificate with them to Mexico to prove
their citizenship when returning to the U.S.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)