Donald Trump Is A Breath of Fresh Air

Since Ross Perrot have we had a presidential candidate who is not afraid to utter the truth. Like Ross Perot, Donald Trump is a breath of fresh air from all the stagnant and nauseating speeches of liberal political correctness of both major political parties.

 Donald Trump said we are not getting the best immigrants out of Mexico.  That is what the realists have been saying for decades.

The government of Mexico for years has been doing the same thing that Fidel Castro admitted doing during the Mariel Boatlift.  In the opening scene of the movie, "Scarface,: we see actual footage of Fidel Castro describing people his troops conveyed to the boats that President Jimmy invited smugglers to use to dump his offal onto the shores of Miami.  Fidel Castro said, "No los queremos!  Son escoria!"  (we do not want them; they are scum). Castro  emptied most of his mental and criminal institutions with  the knowledge, consent and cooperation of Democrat Jimmy Carter.

 Mexico has long been sending its huddled masses of illiterates and political malcontents to engage in their "activism" in this country.  Waving the U.S., flag does not fool anyone.  They are doing that because one of our fifth-columnist activist pointed out that they were advancing the wrong image (i.e., their real, transparent  image). As soon as they get their amnesty, out will come the Mexican flags again. These imported activists will continue to try to conceal  their degenerate and parasitic behavior by alluding to some kind of warped rationale of irredentism. The only difference between Fidel Castro and the Mexican leadership is that Castro is more honest.

Trump is saying what the Mexican government already knows while they continually lobby for America to open its borders to their  "emigrants."  Mexican politicians know that most of these people are "escoria," but they are not going to say that publicly.  They will make tongue-in-cheek utterances about "compassion" and "rights of immigrants," but they exalt in the fact that they are getting rid of their "escoria."

If you wonder why we need to go back to standards, and Common Core, it is because our schools have gone to hell and "educators" worry more about "diversity," and political correctness than teaching.  The answer is  in the  quality (or lack thereof) of our so called "immigrants,' from Mexico and Central America and our lowering of standards to accommodate them.  Bilingual education depends upon a steady stream of illegal illiterate immigrants who do not want to learn English.  K-12 bilingual education will make them illiterate in English and speak with a foreign accent their entire lives.

Donald Trump is the only presidential candidate from either party that dares speak the truth and face reality. Ross Perot lost the presidency only because he wimped out with the lame excuse that he did not want to expose his family to the dirty world of politics--then belatedly got back in the race after alienating most of his original supporters.   That is where Trump differs from Perot and makes him a viable candidate. He will never apologize for being who he is.

Common Core Fights Socially Engineered Illiteracy

After studying Common Core I realized that it is a last ditch effort to make public schools start teaching instead of dumbing down students. All Common Core does is set standards. We need standards. Much opposition comes from Hispanics who have been getting an easy ride through K-12 by choosing the option of bilingual education. A student that takes a full course of bilingual education is not only programmed to be functionally illiterate in English at the finish, but most likely to have an accent that will make him/her seem to be a foreigner for their entire lives.

Joel Garreau, senior fellow on the Council of Foreign Relations (a think tank dedicated to a global, no-border, one-world, government) stated recently on C Span that ten years from now (2025), they will no longer teach reading and writing in public schools, and he talked about it as if it were a triumph. Socially engineered illiteracy will fulfill the implied prophecies of George Orwell's classic novel, "1984." If you have read it, you will remember that the first chapter describes a society that relies on audio-visual indoctrination of the public and mandatory attendance to these sessions. It is not education, it is pure propaganda where the citizens are taught what is politically correect, what is politically incorrect, who our international enemies are, who our friends are, etc. Does that sound familiar?

When our founding fathers established our Government, literacy in Europe was still a privilege of the upper, mostly noble, class. We established out government on the premise that a literate, educated society is necessary for freedom to prevail. The only way we can have a literate society is to set standards and enforce them. Up to the 1960s there were no substitutes for standard performance. If you did not pass a grade, you stayed there until you did, or until you gave up and dropped out. That is the way it should still be. 

Social promotions and declining standards have made a mockery of our public educationl system. Demagogues that want an illiterate sub-class are attacking Common Core; they want a class dependent upon social welfare programs to create a facade of "equality" from cradle to grave. Egalitarianism did not work in the USSR's 70-year experiment, and it will not work in this country. A government cannot legislate equality, except at birth. After that, it is a competitive society and if you are not properly prepared, you should be prepared to take a back seat to leaders who excel not only in academics, but in leadership.

Socially accepted mediocrity is taking its toll on our society. That is the reason we see elected mayors of large cities that say things like "For those that want to destroy, we will give them space to do that." It is time to reverse the trend and see to it that only the educated, the intelligent and the properly prepared citizens assume leadership roles in our society. If the present trend continues, we cannot continue as a free democracy.

Also post on Facebook

Facebook Comments Plugin

Incompetent U.S. District Judges

The Declaration of Independence is not part of the Constitution. It's purpose was to list grievances against the Crown of England to justify the British American Colonies for declaring independence from England.

Almost daily, in the headlines we see how certain elements of our society rely upon hearsay and misconceptions in their daily lives. Demagogues have an iron grip on the minds of many Americans who are either incapable, or ill disposed to discovering what is law and what is not. We should be appalled that a Federal District Judge, Arenda L. Wright, makes absurd statements without researching the law.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/constitution-says-all-men-are-created-equal-nyt-nbc-got-it-wrong-too

NBC has long gotten a pass for erroneous telecasting, sometimes deliberate, especially when Brian Williams was news anchor, but a U.S. District Judge cannot be given a pass.  No law says that all men in the U.S. are created equal. In fact, the phrase, "all men" does not appear in the Constitution.  Equal creation, but not cradle to grave egalitarianism (as proposed by Marxism), was merely a "proposition" in the Declaration of Independence, but it is not a part of the Constitution. Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address reiterated the “proposition,” but he never said it was the law of the land, or anything other than a proposition.

Another popular misconception about our Constitution is that titles of nobility are outlawed. Not true. That was another "proposition," by Congress in 1813, but it was never ratified by more than 26 of the states.

Mr. Mealy-Mouth, Lindsey Graham, Doubles Down on Amnesty Advocacy

Today, on CBS' Face the Nation, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) reiterated his commitment to amnesty for illegal aliens.  The mealy-mouthed politician says we cannot deport eleven million illegal aliens.  Eleven million was the estimated figure twenty years ago. Today, the figure is probably closer to 50 million, because Obama has virtually eliminated the mission of the Border Patrol

Lindsey Graham says he is in favor of letting all illegal aliens stay, but he says he wants to make their pathway to citizenship "long and hard."  That should qualify as the stupid mark of the century. All they want is to stay here, and they know that you cannot change the Constitution to create a second-class citizenry.  It they stay, there is no way you can keep them from enjoying the benefits of all  citizens, except voting and working for the Government (though there is evidence some of them already enjoy those benefits).  If fact, with amnesty, illegal aliens will have an easier time than many middle-class Americans because there is a whole plethora of social welfare programs, private and federal, from which they will benefit.

This mealy mouth Graham is not even a good liar.  We know what he means when he advocates amnesty. Agriculture is still a leading industry in South Carolina and it is among the leading tobacco producing states.  Intelligent citizens do not work in the tobacco industry.  In addition to the many carcinogenic insecticides connected with growing tobacco and other agriculture products, there is the problem of fungus, mold and the natural poisons in tobacco.  Graham knows the importance of tobacco exports and their contribution to the national trade balance, but his position has nothing to do with sympathy with the plight of illegal aliens. He is not the altruist that he wants to dupe us into believing.

• "ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Two days before President Barack Obama announced a posthumous Medal of Honor for black World War I soldier Henry Johnson, a family got staggering news about the legacy of heroism that had inspired them for generations and through three wars. They weren't related to Johnson by blood after all".

• 
  
• We live in an era when facts are easier than ever to obtain, yet an era where people are more and more willing to accept hearsay than facts. We see the phenomenon in claims of police misconduct and in elections. 35% of the people in the electorate will vote for Hillary based on the fact she is a Democrat and disregard any facts that detract from a media generated illusion of saintliness.

On C SPAN I recently heard Joel Garreau (Council on Foreign Relations) say that ten years from now they will not even teach reading and writing in the public schools.  About 35% of Americans  are already functionally illiterate and it won't make much difference because they already rely on hearsay for what they think they know. 

IV Ziedrich, Student of the U of Nevada Says Bush 43 To Blame for Creating ISIS

As an Independent Conservative, I can say there is merit to University of Nevada Student Ivy Ziedrich statement  (5/13/2015) to Jeb Bush, that his brother (Bush 43) created ISIS.  When Bush 43 came to office, he was not unlike Obama in thinking that the world would run itself and all they had to do was sit back and reap the spoils, The terrorists patiently prepared for their economic war against the U.S. during the Clinton Administration, but they waited patiently for Bush to assume power before they attacked en masse (they know how to take advantage of liberal policies).  Bush 43's puppeteers, Dick Cheney and the stuttering Karl Rove were not rocket scientists, just like Valerie Jarrett is not one for Obama.  Wasn't Osama bin Laden's parents guests of the Bush's when the twin towers came down? And wasn't Bush’s primary concern to get them out of the country before his puppeteers decided on a course of action against the terrorists? (in WWII, we put those Japanese "Peace Missionaries" in prison--we did not send them home to protect them).  I know that some current "historians" are trying to alter facts, but I, for one, do not have a short term memory.  People that fancy themselves "conservatives" are just as easy to dupe as people that fancy themselves liberal.   Bush 41, Dubya's' "daddy" engineered the most liberal amnesty ever for illegal aliens in 1987.  When Bush 43 came to power, you did not even need a passport to enter the U.S. across the land borders, and the GOP (post Eisenhower), like the Democrats, had always been happy with that status quo.  Dubya was never able to state a clear objective as to why he invaded Iraq, other than Hussein "tried to kill my daddy."

In the next election, we must choose our poison.  Both parties kowtow to the super-rich think tanks that finance elections, and the think tanks, like the Council on Foreign Relations and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, say that (U.S.) borders are artificial.  They do not mean Russia's, China's--or Switzerland's where they have their specie (not dollars)  stashed.  If you think our political outlook is gloomy, you are coming to terms with reality. 

Changing Education Standards

"The Texas House (recently) passed Senate Bill 149, which creates a graduation committee at each high school to assess whether students should graduate even if they fail as many as two of the five end-of-course tests they take as part of the State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness.”

Source:

http://www.elpasotimes.com/news/ci_27969676/bill-would-allow-high-school-diplomas-bad-test

In a declining society, bureaucracies have traditionally changed definitions and requirements in order to obfuscate failure and to meet current standards.  In other words, to create the illusion that they are meeting standards, they change the standards. The author of “The Peter Principle” was an educator, and his book graphically demonstrates the point; but predictably, educators dismissed it as humorous satire, diminishing its impact on education

In today’s world, anyone who wants a high school, or a college, diploma can get one.  That is the reason we see college graduates, especially in the liberal arts, busing tables at Starbucks (at least the pay is better than McDonalds).

In ages past, overcoming one’s self was a much nobler achievement than a college degree.  That was what Nietzsche meant when he coined the term “overman.” Actually, the term was misinterpreted and initially called “superman,” its meaning corrupted by the vagaries of translating an ancient manuscript of Zoroastrianism. Overcoming one’s self has never been easy, and its achievement usually means isolating one’s self from one’s roots, or natural-born legacy.

The prophesies of Zarathustra dealt with a segment of humankind’s subtle and psychological quest for simplicity and mediocrity.   Islam, a much simpler religion, eventually replaced Zoroastrianism in the latter’s place of origin, Persia.

.