Posts
In order to understand the media’s coddling of Barack Obama, we might start by studying the psychology of the “Cinderella” story. By the media, I mean all the main television networks, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, Fox News and other cable networks that carry “news” stories. The “media” for the purposes of this essay also include all the major national newspapers, magazines (including the tabloids), and some of the lesser known periodicals that convey local and national “news,” often grotesquely distorted, and nearly always liberally biased, to the American public.
The coddling of Obama will go down in history as a national disgrace where the media has violated every moral code that once made our press the envy of other countries in integrity. Our present, tightly-controlled, liberal bias in the media hearkens back to the Cold War when The USSR kept tight control over its two principal news sources: TASS and Pravda. Remember, the Bolsheviks described themselves as socialist and liberals until they led Russia to a totalitarian dictatorship (and so did Hitler before he took over Germany).
Almost every published news story in our mainstream media shows Obama in a favorable light; every published photo is carefully selected to flatter him and reinforce their fantasy of him as congenial and sympathetic. They contribute their own enchanting remarks, and we the public are oriented to believe that he is “handsome,” in spite of the over-sized, protruding, cupped outer ears that have caused us to describe certain people of the white race as “homely.” In fact, the long hair of the 1960s hippie movement was said by some to hide “homely” ears. If we mention the flared nostrils, the shortly-cropped, kinky hair and the large mouth, we risk being called “racists.”
However, it is just because of the above-mentioned, physical features that cause our black population to have their own, exclusive “beauty contests” for African-Americans only, such as the Miss Black America Pageant. Whites are not eligible for entry into the “Miss Black America” contest for one obvious reason: our concept of “beauty” is different from that of African-Americans. There have been some black females that won the Miss America Pageant, but remember: physical beauty is only one of many criteria that the judges consider. We should remember that the Miss America Pageant, and other similar “beauty contents” are not under government-control, as some people actually believe, and I have heard more than one young female say, “Miss America represents America.” The “Pageant,” is of course, a privately-owned organization that makes its own rules, and its winners represent the pageant. However, it is obvious that the Miss America Pageant bends sharply to political pressure in selecting its “winners,” and we see the influence of the globalist’s influence of “diversity” entering into their criteria for selection of winners.
To understand the Cinderella Factor, we must understand that the media certainly is not using the traditional, Anglo concept of beauty (or handsomeness) when they describe Obama as “handsome.” However, there are many other areas other than physical appearance where the media shows its bias in defending and nurturing their “Cin-derella.” The media, in tandem with the Democrat Party, had been grooming Obama as a “Cinderella Story” for a long time before the election of 2008. However, the real, fairy tale that we use as a template for “Cinderella stories” does not end when Cinderella becomes the princess of her land. She and the people of the kingdom lived happily ever after. In America’s “Cinderella story,” starring Barack Obama, it appears that someone other than the real Cinderella disguised himself and now turns out to be an impostor. It would be like re-writing the original fairy tale with a new twist, where, at the end, we reveal that Cinderella actually was one of her mean, ugly stepsisters in some kind of modern, Hollywood-type of disguise.
When finally exposed, the impact of our faux Cinderella will have much more effect than just exposing a charlatan in the White House. His influence is much more than just being the media’s poster boy and standard for a dubious, “beauty” template; his policies and his legacy will change American in a deleterious way for the rest of our “fairy tale;” that is, posterity. We will not know everything about “Cinderella” until after Obama leaves office when we finally gain access to records, especially school records, including closely-guarded theses that will tell us much about his thoughts and his concept of American and how he would like to change it. We may even see the original autobiography, for some strange reason not published, that had an editor’s introduction that said he was born in Kenya. The original was not titled, “Dreams of my Father,” but “Journeys of Blacks and Whites.”
We already know much of Obama’s philosophical outlook due to Freudian slips, when, early in his Presidency, he frequently used the Marxist phrase, “redistribution of wealth.” Truly, we have a President that is at war with capitalism and one who is nurturing national class warfare as evidenced by the radicals that surround him, and mentors, such as Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright, in concert with the media that have groomed “Cinderella” to “rule” our nation “from day one.”
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Monday, June 18, 2012
Obama's Impeachable Offense Against the Constitution
The last President to be impeached for Usurpation of Powers was Andrew Johnson. After impeachment, Johnson was saved from conviction and imprisonment by one vote in the Senate in 1865. Bill Clinton was impeached for blatant perjury and saved from conviction by a corrupt Democrat Senate, ignoring the evidence and thus marking a downward spiral in national moral values. Clinton was a self-described “relativist” who seemed to believe that moral values have no legitimate, historical bases.
Comes now Barack Hussein Obama who has clearly committed the offense for which president Andrew Johnson was impeached: Usurpation of (Congressional) powers. Naturalization and immigration laws, come exclusively under the purview of Congressional authority pursuant to Article II, Section 8 of the Constitution.
Obama has illegally assumed the power to grant stays of deportation, and possibly suspension of deportation, to certain classes of illegal aliens without consultation or approval by Congress. Authority to grant Suspensions and stays of deportation authority are found in Title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act. This Act has been in force, with minor amendments, since December 24, 1952, when Congress passed it over Democrat President Harry Truman’s veto. It is also known as the McCarran-Walter Act. The override of Truman’s veto is prima facie evidence that Congress has exclusive authority over naturalization and immigration (Title II and Title III of the McCarran-Walter Act, respectively).
Authority to grant stays of deportation is part of Title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act. See:
Stays of Deportation: 8 C.F.R. 241.21
Also see: http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/241.21
Suspension of Deportation: Title 8 United States Code 12.40.20 and 1240.21.
See: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr;rgn=div5;view=text;node=8%3A1.0.2.5.19;idno=8;sid=2c360611d2b73751c04fccbc4e9d5c29;cc=ecfr#8:1.0.2.5.19.2.1.1
The Impeachment of President Johnson for Usurpation of Powers: http://www.impeach-andrewjohnson.com/09impeachmentandacquittal/vi-37.htm
Comes now Barack Hussein Obama who has clearly committed the offense for which president Andrew Johnson was impeached: Usurpation of (Congressional) powers. Naturalization and immigration laws, come exclusively under the purview of Congressional authority pursuant to Article II, Section 8 of the Constitution.
Obama has illegally assumed the power to grant stays of deportation, and possibly suspension of deportation, to certain classes of illegal aliens without consultation or approval by Congress. Authority to grant Suspensions and stays of deportation authority are found in Title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act. This Act has been in force, with minor amendments, since December 24, 1952, when Congress passed it over Democrat President Harry Truman’s veto. It is also known as the McCarran-Walter Act. The override of Truman’s veto is prima facie evidence that Congress has exclusive authority over naturalization and immigration (Title II and Title III of the McCarran-Walter Act, respectively).
Authority to grant stays of deportation is part of Title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act. See:
Stays of Deportation: 8 C.F.R. 241.21
Also see: http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/241.21
Suspension of Deportation: Title 8 United States Code 12.40.20 and 1240.21.
See: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr;rgn=div5;view=text;node=8%3A1.0.2.5.19;idno=8;sid=2c360611d2b73751c04fccbc4e9d5c29;cc=ecfr#8:1.0.2.5.19.2.1.1
The Impeachment of President Johnson for Usurpation of Powers: http://www.impeach-andrewjohnson.com/09impeachmentandacquittal/vi-37.htm
Sunday, June 17, 2012
Is Obama’s Executive Order Constitutional?
The Constitution does not mention the word “immigration,” but in Article I, Section 8, it clearly limits naturalization to Congress. Immigration is the preliminary, qualifying stage for naturalization; that is, for becoming a foreign-born citizen of the United States.
Naturalization comes under Title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. It follows Title II of that Act, which is titled “Immigration.” This Act was passed by Congress (not by executive order) on June 27, 1952. It became law on December 24, 1952 after Congress overrode a veto by then President Harry Truman. The fact that Democrat President Truman unsuccessfully tried to stop the Act from becoming law, by veto, is prima facie evidence that immigration laws fall exclusively within the purview of Congressional authority. Although there have been amendments to the Act, it is basically the same as it was in 1952 as regards the qualifications for naturalization. See the McCarran-Walter Act.
In order to become naturalized, an immigrant must first be LAWFULLY ADMITTED to the United States. This means that he/she must first comply with Title III of the Act. Among the qualifications: The applicant must complete a period of LEGAL residence (normally five years); must be proficient in English, U.S. History and not have any felony convictions.
Clearly, Obama’s executive order, granting advance clemency to aliens illegally in the United States, is an attempt to abnegate Title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Obama’s advance clemency for illegal aliens, before any charges of deportation have been filed against most of them, is clearly a step to help them circumvent our immigration and naturalization laws. Its timing says it all, as far as Obama’s motive is concerned. The Supreme Court is expected to rule as early as Monday, June 18, 2012 as to the Constitutionality of Arizona’s law regarding State enforcement of immigration laws. Joe Arpaio, Sheriff of Arizona’s most populous county, Maricopa, says that he will begin enforcement of Arizona’s law as soon as it is declared Constitutional. It is inconceivable the AZ law would be declared unconstitutional, since there is a federal law already on the books authorizing state and local law enforcement officers to arrest illegal aliens. See title 8, United States Code 1357(g), or simply 8 USC 1357(g).
Obama’s illegal clemency act for illegal aliens is obviously a measure to garner support of the so-called Latino community. His, and the Democrats’ concept of the “Latino,” lumps them all into one group. It ignores that most of them have complied with our laws and want to be able to compete for jobs in the U.S. as traditional, law-abiding citizens without being discriminated against because of their Hispanic surnames. Obama’s act will have a negative impact for law-abiding U.S. citizens with Hispanic surnames. He fallaciously assumes that radicals, who are self-appointed spokespersons for illegal aliens, speak for ALL Hispanics in the U.S., when in fact they are self-serving political activists who are seeking more political power for themselves and more government handouts and grants for their organizations.
Naturalization comes under Title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. It follows Title II of that Act, which is titled “Immigration.” This Act was passed by Congress (not by executive order) on June 27, 1952. It became law on December 24, 1952 after Congress overrode a veto by then President Harry Truman. The fact that Democrat President Truman unsuccessfully tried to stop the Act from becoming law, by veto, is prima facie evidence that immigration laws fall exclusively within the purview of Congressional authority. Although there have been amendments to the Act, it is basically the same as it was in 1952 as regards the qualifications for naturalization. See the McCarran-Walter Act.
In order to become naturalized, an immigrant must first be LAWFULLY ADMITTED to the United States. This means that he/she must first comply with Title III of the Act. Among the qualifications: The applicant must complete a period of LEGAL residence (normally five years); must be proficient in English, U.S. History and not have any felony convictions.
Clearly, Obama’s executive order, granting advance clemency to aliens illegally in the United States, is an attempt to abnegate Title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Obama’s advance clemency for illegal aliens, before any charges of deportation have been filed against most of them, is clearly a step to help them circumvent our immigration and naturalization laws. Its timing says it all, as far as Obama’s motive is concerned. The Supreme Court is expected to rule as early as Monday, June 18, 2012 as to the Constitutionality of Arizona’s law regarding State enforcement of immigration laws. Joe Arpaio, Sheriff of Arizona’s most populous county, Maricopa, says that he will begin enforcement of Arizona’s law as soon as it is declared Constitutional. It is inconceivable the AZ law would be declared unconstitutional, since there is a federal law already on the books authorizing state and local law enforcement officers to arrest illegal aliens. See title 8, United States Code 1357(g), or simply 8 USC 1357(g).
Obama’s illegal clemency act for illegal aliens is obviously a measure to garner support of the so-called Latino community. His, and the Democrats’ concept of the “Latino,” lumps them all into one group. It ignores that most of them have complied with our laws and want to be able to compete for jobs in the U.S. as traditional, law-abiding citizens without being discriminated against because of their Hispanic surnames. Obama’s act will have a negative impact for law-abiding U.S. citizens with Hispanic surnames. He fallaciously assumes that radicals, who are self-appointed spokespersons for illegal aliens, speak for ALL Hispanics in the U.S., when in fact they are self-serving political activists who are seeking more political power for themselves and more government handouts and grants for their organizations.
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Red Herrings and the Obama Trail
Someday, perhaps after he lives office, Obama will become transparent. Why do you suppose it is so hard to get any kind of record on Obama? As a former INS agent, I know that we often find inconsistencies with one's birth record, when comparing them to one’s school, driving, medical and other records. If I had been dispatched to some of the former alleged residences of Obama, I could have probably obtained many records showing that Obama was born in Kenya, or maybe even some other places. There are reasons that some people often falsify biographical, especially school, records. Among them is to pay lower (resident or citizen) tuition rates at schools, or even just to gain eligibility to matriculate. However, I cannot ignore the fact that Obama's first book (strangely unpublished) allegedly had a biography in it by the tentative publishers that said he was born in Kenya. The title was "Journeys of Blacks and Whites," or something very similar. I have not heard, nor seen, any reason for it not having being published. His later (revised?) biography in "Dreams of my Father" reportedly did not say he was born in Kenya, but served his obvious purpose of a rationale for having pride in Kenyan roots.
I did not, and will not, read either version of his biography, because when I listen to him speak, I know he is not addressing me, or anyone with intelligence; his target is dumbed-down and doped-down America. He is clever enough to exploit national frailties (i.e., to connect with the drug culture), but no smarter than your ordinary, street-wise Chicago drug-pusher-pimps whose targets are mentally similar, and no match for a glib, artificially "congenial" friend of everyone.
By trying to palm himself off as a chronic drug user in his earlier days, it is apparent that Obama, like Bill Clinton, wants to connect to the drug culture (it worked for Clinton, even though he claimed he did not inhale).
As a former INS agent, I know that trying to track down the history of an immigration fraud and liar, whether alien or citizen is like trying to follow an endless trail of red herrings. The INS never spent many resources to do it, especially when the trail extended across the globe. Needless to say, error-free, spotless, perfectly-centered, recently obtained birth records are of little use to allay suspicions. I know that money and political power can buy just about anything in America, and Hawaii is certainly no exception.
Like I say, time will tell and maybe someday explain the inconsistencies and seemingly missing links in the Obama biography. The fact that makes me shudder most is that the globalized mentality of our population neutralizes any care as to where our President was born or how he was politically indoctrinated. That is another national frailty that could easily be exploited by Obama.
I did not, and will not, read either version of his biography, because when I listen to him speak, I know he is not addressing me, or anyone with intelligence; his target is dumbed-down and doped-down America. He is clever enough to exploit national frailties (i.e., to connect with the drug culture), but no smarter than your ordinary, street-wise Chicago drug-pusher-pimps whose targets are mentally similar, and no match for a glib, artificially "congenial" friend of everyone.
By trying to palm himself off as a chronic drug user in his earlier days, it is apparent that Obama, like Bill Clinton, wants to connect to the drug culture (it worked for Clinton, even though he claimed he did not inhale).
As a former INS agent, I know that trying to track down the history of an immigration fraud and liar, whether alien or citizen is like trying to follow an endless trail of red herrings. The INS never spent many resources to do it, especially when the trail extended across the globe. Needless to say, error-free, spotless, perfectly-centered, recently obtained birth records are of little use to allay suspicions. I know that money and political power can buy just about anything in America, and Hawaii is certainly no exception.
Like I say, time will tell and maybe someday explain the inconsistencies and seemingly missing links in the Obama biography. The fact that makes me shudder most is that the globalized mentality of our population neutralizes any care as to where our President was born or how he was politically indoctrinated. That is another national frailty that could easily be exploited by Obama.
Sunday, May 27, 2012
The Rhetoric of "Gap and Connect"
This is politically incorrect, but absolutely true, so let's hope, by some stroke of luck, it gets past the Topix censors. (So far, 05/27/2012, Topix has not published it. It was addressed to, and part of, the thread started by a forum member of the Memphis, TN, Topix Forum).
First, my condolences, Jobless One. (Illegal) immigration is here, there, and everywhere in the U.S., 365 days per year, but deportation is anathema to the Obama Administration. We are paying thousands of immigration agents to feebly attempt a "count" of illegal aliens in anticipation of the next amnesty (We've had three class-action amnesties since 1987). Obama is pro amnesty and Governor Mitt Romney is pro LEGAL immigration. That is a stark and real difference.
If there is a “round-up” going on in Memphis, or elsewhere, it does not necessarily mean that the illegal aliens are being sent home. Most are counted and released back into society to await the next amnesty.
The liberal, mainstream media is charging that Governor Mitt Romney cannot "connect" with, and that he has a "gap" to close with, the "Hispanic voters." The only "gaps" I see are the big mouths of the liberal commentators like that of Bob Schieffer, Gloria Borger and the other heavily biased, liberal mainstream reporters.
There is no legitimate "Hispanic" vote, so there cannot be a "gap” between them any any candidate. What most Hispanic Americans want, as citizens, is a job and to be, or remain, taxpayers, rather than burdens upon them. Competing with third world migrants is an obstacle, not a blessing to most of our law-abiding Hispanic citizens (Obama sees them as one and the same).
When there is widespread unemployment, it is insane to vote for someone (Obama) who wants to legalize up to 30 million new, uneducated, impoverished people who, rather than try to combat the despots in their homeland, want to take the easy way out and make themselves a burden on the U.S. taxpayer. Never mind that they bring to this country the same political passivity that allowed despots to take over and oppress their home countries.
Obama (along with his liberal media minions) lumps all Hispanics into one category and that includes a massive amount of illegal aliens. He promises all more handouts for their votes. It is a fact that some illegal aliens vote in our elections; hence liberals and Democrats are against voter I.D. The bribes he paid to get Obama Care passed into law, and now challenges the Supreme Court to strike down (a law "passed by a Democratic Congress”), are not dissimilar to the promises of more handouts in exchange for the "Hispanic vote," instead of a promise to return to the work ethic in this country.
As a jobless person, next November you can be one vote and one voice to help us to stop the invasion and contagion of insanity. We all must demand a stop to the invasion; and we must demand the enforcement of the Constitutional duty (Article IV, Section 4) for which Obama has shown the utmost contempt.
First, my condolences, Jobless One. (Illegal) immigration is here, there, and everywhere in the U.S., 365 days per year, but deportation is anathema to the Obama Administration. We are paying thousands of immigration agents to feebly attempt a "count" of illegal aliens in anticipation of the next amnesty (We've had three class-action amnesties since 1987). Obama is pro amnesty and Governor Mitt Romney is pro LEGAL immigration. That is a stark and real difference.
If there is a “round-up” going on in Memphis, or elsewhere, it does not necessarily mean that the illegal aliens are being sent home. Most are counted and released back into society to await the next amnesty.
The liberal, mainstream media is charging that Governor Mitt Romney cannot "connect" with, and that he has a "gap" to close with, the "Hispanic voters." The only "gaps" I see are the big mouths of the liberal commentators like that of Bob Schieffer, Gloria Borger and the other heavily biased, liberal mainstream reporters.
There is no legitimate "Hispanic" vote, so there cannot be a "gap” between them any any candidate. What most Hispanic Americans want, as citizens, is a job and to be, or remain, taxpayers, rather than burdens upon them. Competing with third world migrants is an obstacle, not a blessing to most of our law-abiding Hispanic citizens (Obama sees them as one and the same).
When there is widespread unemployment, it is insane to vote for someone (Obama) who wants to legalize up to 30 million new, uneducated, impoverished people who, rather than try to combat the despots in their homeland, want to take the easy way out and make themselves a burden on the U.S. taxpayer. Never mind that they bring to this country the same political passivity that allowed despots to take over and oppress their home countries.
Obama (along with his liberal media minions) lumps all Hispanics into one category and that includes a massive amount of illegal aliens. He promises all more handouts for their votes. It is a fact that some illegal aliens vote in our elections; hence liberals and Democrats are against voter I.D. The bribes he paid to get Obama Care passed into law, and now challenges the Supreme Court to strike down (a law "passed by a Democratic Congress”), are not dissimilar to the promises of more handouts in exchange for the "Hispanic vote," instead of a promise to return to the work ethic in this country.
As a jobless person, next November you can be one vote and one voice to help us to stop the invasion and contagion of insanity. We all must demand a stop to the invasion; and we must demand the enforcement of the Constitutional duty (Article IV, Section 4) for which Obama has shown the utmost contempt.
Monday, May 7, 2012
Another Insane Obama Policy
“Muslim Speaker Mike Ghouse
NURTURING PLURALISTIC VALUES EMBEDDED IN ISLAM”
((A headline on one of his many web pages)
“Ghouse is a frequent guest on Fox News, (The Hannity Show), and has been interviewed on nationally syndicated Radio shows along with Dallas TV, Print and Radio networks and occasional interviews on NPR. He is a member of the Texas Faith panel of Dallas Morning News and writes on issues facing the nation every week.”
First of all, any thinking person who has observed Islam for a few years knows that “pluralism” is NOT “embedded” in their line of thought. Anyone who is not a Muslim is an infidel and a worker of Satan, by their line of thought. I have lived in a Muslim country in the military, and as military personnel, I had occasion to briefly visit other several Muslim countries.
On the Hannity Show on Fox News on 5/07/2012, Ghouse exercised his frequent role as an apologist for Obama. He said that Obama’s recent practice of releasing former Muslim anti-American militants from prisons in order to cultivate their sympathy, and that of former Taliban fighters, in hopes that,, in their gratitude, they will refrain from anti-American violence (until at least after his self-assured re-election?) is a good policy. I think it is just as insane as Operation Fast and Furious.
Why do the national mainstream media coddle Ghouse?
The answer to that question: It is probably because the media thinks that they have found the moderate Muslim voice that they seek to justify their own misguided complacency and apathy in the face of the Muslim threat to destroy Americans’ lives. Ghouse astutely recognized this niche and is economically exploiting it. The liberal, biased media have long ago committed themselves to the concept of the benefits of “diversity” of all religions and nationalities, and they try in vain to reconcile that concept with traditional American values. Pluralism destroyed the Roman and other empires. Even the Holy Bible recognizes the hazards of diversity, in Genesis 11:1 and Genesis 11:5-8 we see that God saw diverse language as a way of punishing his people.
It was the misguided concept of there being "benefits" to diversity that influenced our Government to open up our ports, ignore 8 CFR 235.1(a)(1) by giving inadmissible people the benefit of the doubt, and, as a result, admit illiterate, insolvent peasants, many of whom, on 9-1-2011 turned out to be suicide bombers. If Pollyanna were a real person, not even she would buy such a misguided concept. Only part of America’s dumbed-down college community are buying it. The student opponents do not speak up because to do so would endanger their grades (since most students are parroting the ideas of socialist college professors), and maybe even endanger their safety, since there are genuinely, potentially violent criminals on every college campus.
NURTURING PLURALISTIC VALUES EMBEDDED IN ISLAM”
((A headline on one of his many web pages)
“Ghouse is a frequent guest on Fox News, (The Hannity Show), and has been interviewed on nationally syndicated Radio shows along with Dallas TV, Print and Radio networks and occasional interviews on NPR. He is a member of the Texas Faith panel of Dallas Morning News and writes on issues facing the nation every week.”
First of all, any thinking person who has observed Islam for a few years knows that “pluralism” is NOT “embedded” in their line of thought. Anyone who is not a Muslim is an infidel and a worker of Satan, by their line of thought. I have lived in a Muslim country in the military, and as military personnel, I had occasion to briefly visit other several Muslim countries.
On the Hannity Show on Fox News on 5/07/2012, Ghouse exercised his frequent role as an apologist for Obama. He said that Obama’s recent practice of releasing former Muslim anti-American militants from prisons in order to cultivate their sympathy, and that of former Taliban fighters, in hopes that,, in their gratitude, they will refrain from anti-American violence (until at least after his self-assured re-election?) is a good policy. I think it is just as insane as Operation Fast and Furious.
Why do the national mainstream media coddle Ghouse?
The answer to that question: It is probably because the media thinks that they have found the moderate Muslim voice that they seek to justify their own misguided complacency and apathy in the face of the Muslim threat to destroy Americans’ lives. Ghouse astutely recognized this niche and is economically exploiting it. The liberal, biased media have long ago committed themselves to the concept of the benefits of “diversity” of all religions and nationalities, and they try in vain to reconcile that concept with traditional American values. Pluralism destroyed the Roman and other empires. Even the Holy Bible recognizes the hazards of diversity, in Genesis 11:1 and Genesis 11:5-8 we see that God saw diverse language as a way of punishing his people.
It was the misguided concept of there being "benefits" to diversity that influenced our Government to open up our ports, ignore 8 CFR 235.1(a)(1) by giving inadmissible people the benefit of the doubt, and, as a result, admit illiterate, insolvent peasants, many of whom, on 9-1-2011 turned out to be suicide bombers. If Pollyanna were a real person, not even she would buy such a misguided concept. Only part of America’s dumbed-down college community are buying it. The student opponents do not speak up because to do so would endanger their grades (since most students are parroting the ideas of socialist college professors), and maybe even endanger their safety, since there are genuinely, potentially violent criminals on every college campus.
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Have the Proletariats and Plebeians Taken Over?
Objectivity (and the freedom from subjectivity) enable foreigners to see things that U.S. liberals and even some conservatives will never concede. Below, are just a few of our many recent profound, national embarrassments:
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/03/24/danish-tv-host-humiliates-obama-with-clips-showing-identical-compliments/
Obama and his first lady (who put her hands on the Queen) have a ton of gall and even more gauche. Europeans think we have already had our proletariat revolution and that the plebeians have taken over the U.S. the way they took Russian in 1917 and the way they took over Germany in 1933.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama-isms.htm
The truth has come through. And don’t give me that bull about his Ivy League degree. Phil Donahue proved years ago that you can get one without being literate. It’s even worse now. Screams of racism and blaming everything bad on Bush, are tacks that no longer work.
Who said (something like): “Psst! Medvedev! I’m a shoo-in for re-election! After the election I’ll have more flexibility in making defensive concessions against your awesome ICBM arsenal.”
Or (something like): “The Supreme Court would not dare strike down a law passed by a Democrat Congress (never mind that we had to pay them some bribes to to get it passed.)”
And don’t forget Fast and Furious.
Romney’s arsenal is overflowing, and the above is just the tip of the iceberg. Have faith. We are on the way back.
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/03/24/danish-tv-host-humiliates-obama-with-clips-showing-identical-compliments/
Obama and his first lady (who put her hands on the Queen) have a ton of gall and even more gauche. Europeans think we have already had our proletariat revolution and that the plebeians have taken over the U.S. the way they took Russian in 1917 and the way they took over Germany in 1933.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama-isms.htm
The truth has come through. And don’t give me that bull about his Ivy League degree. Phil Donahue proved years ago that you can get one without being literate. It’s even worse now. Screams of racism and blaming everything bad on Bush, are tacks that no longer work.
Who said (something like): “Psst! Medvedev! I’m a shoo-in for re-election! After the election I’ll have more flexibility in making defensive concessions against your awesome ICBM arsenal.”
Or (something like): “The Supreme Court would not dare strike down a law passed by a Democrat Congress (never mind that we had to pay them some bribes to to get it passed.)”
And don’t forget Fast and Furious.
Romney’s arsenal is overflowing, and the above is just the tip of the iceberg. Have faith. We are on the way back.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)