Human Rights Watch Group Slanders Law Enforcement

How does the so-called, Human Rights Watch Group get away with slander, defamation of character and libel against present and former Federal law enforcement officers? Moreover, how do they get away with pretending to be a United Nations-sponsored organization in the heading of their publication, which, on the web site, is in faded letters, and even though the UN logo is followed by a disclaimer? Their disclaimer, like the fine print on suspect products, fulfills the requirement of law, but does nothing to erase the false impression they convey to readers. Their tactic is much like the biased mainstream media that tries to represent something, but usually stops just short of a criminal act. Sometimes the media crosses that line, and I think the HRWG has crossed it in their web page. They are trying to hijack credibility by giving the impression that they are UN affiliated. This alone demonstrates their dishonesty and false claims to being a valid organization. The HRWG membership includes communists, anarchists and criminals.

Defaming Federal law enforcement agencies and individual agents has long been a practice of HRWG. Although there have been a few bad apples in the Federal Agencies, they have been dealt with without any input or contribution by the HRWG. Most Federal agents, however, are dedicated to a patriotic preservation of our international borders and protection of our sovereignty against the invasion by third-world international parasites (illegal aliens) that the HRWG wants to protect, coddle and nourish. The honest agents have nearly always survived their attempts to get indictments from trumped-up false charges that are nothing more than harassment and attempts to intimidate dedicated officers.

The leaders of this movement include racketeers who lead the so-called, “sanctuary movement,” a thinly disguised criminal enterprise of smuggling and harboring illegal aliens, led by the Unitarian Universalist Church and some other pseudo-religious subversive denominations. Their real aim is to increase their economic and political power by building up their membership. Their targets are the illiterate, third world invaders and trespassers that are looking for American handouts and welfare. These conspirators in subversion of Federal law are engaged in an ongoing criminal enterprise, one the aims of which is to dodge payment of taxes as a “non-profit” organization. Many churches have, or sponsor, “shelters” for illegal aliens to stay in while spurious applications for asylum are processed. They can buy a lot of time while the asylum applications are being processed, and in the meantime they get temporary work permits. In the meantime, some of these shelters farm out the illegal aliens as cheap day labor that further enriches the coffers of the sponsors. Income tax evasion is sometimes the only way that clever, enterprising criminal organizations can be put out of business, as in the case of Al Capone and his fellow racketeers. The claim of religion, or alliance with religious organizations, should no longer be a carte blanche that protects American racketeers. We need an Executive Branch that is willing to take them on, expose them for what they are, and take prosecutorial action—not one that uses them and illegal aliens for leverage to advance his own agenda.

Supposedly, the HRWG and their subversive supporters get by with defaming Federal officers by their allegation that the officers are “public figures” and not protected by the slander, libel and defamation laws that protect average citizens. Their attacks in Internet publications are mostly against honest, law-abiding enforcement personnel. Much of their “research” sources consist of border and Mexican tabloids or mainstream, border publications whose distortions are just as lacking in integrity and no more credible better than those of the Mexican tabloids. Any scurrilous, spurious story about Border Patrolmen violating the civil rights of illegal aliens sells big along the border. Truth, to their readers, as well as to their publishers, is totally irrelevant. The HRWG thrives upon false, distorted abuse charges trumped up against Federal agents by crooked lawyers who make a living protecting drug dealers and illegal aliens, who are usually one and the same. Fortunately, they are not taken seriously by any educated, honest, logically-thinking citizens. In addition to attacks against Federal lawmen, they sometimes publish screeds that try to undermine immigration law enforcement. An example is an essay published by Jennifer Chacon, a former HRWG activist (and former member of the Obama staff), who once published an essay on the web that made the ridiculous comparison of deportation of illegal aliens to the slave, Dred Scott, who was separated from his family by the slave market. My personal answer to her absurd Dred Scott analogy is mentioned on the web on the Pat Dollard web site:

http://patdollard.com/2011/05/feds-change-how-border-security-is-gauged-in-effort-to-hide-failure/

As you can see, the HRWG, digs deep, in some cases, goes back over twenty years, to try to dig up dirt that can be misinterpreted, through deliberate distortions, to show that I, or other agents, was guilty of human rights violations. They also use these tactics to try to discredit sources, like myself, that write and speak about the problem of illegal immigration and advocate proper measures to deal with it. We who regularly advocate border control and retention of our national sovereignty are primary targets. In the early 1990s, fighting these spurious charges became every day activities for many federal agents, especially those who tried to do the job they were sworn to do. They, like Sheriff Joe Arpaio is today, were primary targets of these attacks. Complaints were filed anonymously, even by felons inside federal prisons, and were entertained as valid by INS supervisory staff and apparently entertained by Janet Napolitano who was U.S. Attorney for Southern Arizona at the time. Anonymous, telephone complaints were made against agents who were not even on duty the alleged date of the violations, and one such complaint was made against me. My answer was short: “I was off duty that day.” No supervisor, or Napolitano’s office, carried the case any further, but neither did they issue any memo or word to say that we were “cleared.” If you read the current headlines you can see that things have only gotten worse as Governor Jan Brewer leads the battle against those making spurious attacks against her, Sheriff Arpaio, and most all law enforcement officers in the the war that the Obama Administration has declared against her, Arizona and immigration law enforcement. We have to be ever vigilant to answer in kind these peoples attack, but in my case, I’ll continue to answer, but stick to the truth.

If these seditious “human rights watch groups,” succeed in their goal of bringing about anarchy through scurrilous attacks on lawmen, they will show their true colors. They will then hide and try to get those weak, illiterate parasites they purport to “represent” do their fighting for them. But when that day comes, true Americans will ferret out the real leaders, and someday they will get what they ask for, but not what they expect. The atrocities they accuse lawmen of today will suddenly seem totally innocuous in comparison to their just deserts.