Posts
Around noon, one day several years ago, my wife and I patronized
a small restaurant across from the west side of the village plaza in Villa Ahumada,
Chihuahua. While we dined, we watched at
least 200 young men climbed onto railway freight cars of a departing train, very unmolested by the
train crew or any local law enforcement agency. The servers told us that the
train stops there every day to drop off a freight car or two—and pick a car or two--and people—lots
of people, all young men from about age 17-25. Villa Ahumada seems to be a staging are for potential illegal immigrants that come from villages from miles around that do not have a railroad to the border. Some riders come into Villa Ahumada on the train.
The practice of affording free transportation to so-called immigrants
to the U.S. has been an institutionalized policy of the Mexican Government
since they nationalized all the railroads during the Mexican Revolution. Following the
Revolution, the entirety of the Mexican rail system was nationalized between 1929
and 1937. After the Mexicans ran the railroad off the proverbial cliff in 2009,
it was privatized again, and American investors once again own a controlling
interest. They seem to be willing to risk losing their investment without remuneration again. Illegal riders are still
unmolested by either the railroads or the Mexican authorities, foreign ownership not withstanding.
Although the liberal media ignores the fact, Donald Trump
recognizes that our politicians have surrendered our sovereignty to
Mexico. If you believe the media,
Mexicans are now calling the shots as to which Republican candidate has a
chance to win the American Presidential election in 2016. The self-styled revolutionaries made some
huge progress in the early 1990s when
they got American secondary and college educators to place major emphasis on “diversity.” It was a way of watering down our education
system to accommodate a Tower of Babel approach to “progress.”
Criminals are given
two choices by local Mexican authorities: either go the U.S. (illegally, of
course) or go to jail. Jail is often a
euphemism for a shallow grave a few miles out of town in unofficial cemeteries
for troublemakers. Mexico does not have even a small percentage of the
jails or prisons needed to house all their criminals.
Although they never use the term, many of Mexico’s potential
revolutionaries and other troublemakers find America’s “free speech” an outlet
for things they dare not say about their government in Mexico. One big problem is our own
troublemakers, Hispanic activists that see themselves as self-styled irredentists are channeling these imported troublemakers' energy into their “movement”
that they call “La Reconquista.” The
term, “Reconquista” means, “re-conquest,”
and was coined by the Spaniards when they got run out of New Mexico by the
Navajos, and for 12 years plotted their (successful) “re-conquest” of Santa Fe and New Mexico
in the 17th century.
Tuesday, June 30, 2015, the CBS News Anchor stated that NBC
severed their ties with Donald Trump due to Trump’s recent “derogatory remarks
about immigrants.” Of course, that is a
lie that rivals any from erstwhile NBC Anchor, “Lyin' Brian” Williams. Trump knows that we are a nation of immigrants and if the Government handled immigration according to law, it is a
good thing, and we get good, educated and law abiding Immigrants. Moreover, Trump's commentary on illegal Mexicans is directed to the Mexican Government, not the good, screened true immigrants that abide by our immigration laws. Even the term “immigrants” has been corrupted
by the media sources, like Scott Pelley, to avoid use of the correct term for when they usually mean “illegal
aliens.”
