Is It Correct to Call Obama a Marxist?

Ellis Washington is one of the most noteworthy African-American legal scholars. Such amateurs as Eric Holder and Barack Obama cannot hold a candle to him.

Marxists, like Fidel Castro, Lenin and Trotsky perforce deny that they are Marxists--until they take over a country.

Ellis Washington, using the dialectic method of Socrates, makes a clear-cut case for Obama’s Marxist philosophy. You cannot constantly utter the maxims of Marxism and then declare that you disbelieve them. History repeatedly documents that Marxism’s path to power is deception of the masses, or the Proletarians, who usually are venal, uneducated and lacking in perceptive discernment, or objectivity. They all think they will prosper under Marxism. Marxist advocates always follow the Machiavellian creed of the end justifying any deceptive means.

Obama, when questioned, denied that he is a Marxist. That is like a child caught with his hand in the cookie jar denying that he was going to steal a cookie. The old cliché comes into play:“If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck…”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/is-obama-a-marxist...

Another fact that new supporters of Marxism cannot come to grips with is that the ideology always requires a police state--like that of Cuba--and that of the former Soviet Union. The reason is that mankind is naturally competitive and creative and they like to be rewarded for their efforts with accolades and remuneration. In a Marxist society, individualism is always repressed in favor of enforced mediocrity. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need," a fundamental maxim of Marxism proscribes individual excellence in anything other than exaltation of the central government. That theory is expounded in the Marxist credo of "redistribution of
wealth," and preached and practiced until everyone reaches socio-economic strata of equality.

It is therefore perfectly legitimate and correct to call Obama a Marxist. Just ask Ellis Washington.